The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome editing assessment using CRISPR Genome Analyzer (CRISPR-GA)
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based technologies have revolutionized human genome engineering and opened countless possibilities to basic science, synthetic biology and gene therapy. Albeit the enormous potential of these tools, their performance is far from perfect. It is essential to perform a posterior careful analysis of the gene editing experiment. However, there are no computational tools for genome editing assessment yet, and current experimental tools lack sensitivity and flexibility. We present a platform to assess the quality of a genome editing experiment only with three mouse clicks. The method evaluates next-generation data to quantify and characterize insertions, deletions and homologous recombination. CRISPR Genome Analyzer provides a report for the locus selected, which includes a quantification of the edited site and the analysis of the different alterations detected. The platform maps the reads, estimates and locates insertions and deletions, computes the allele replacement efficiency and provides a report integrating all the information. Availability and implementation: CRISPR-GA Web is available at http://crispr-ga.net . Documentation on CRISPR-GA instructions can be found at http://crispr-ga.net/documentation.html Contact: mguell@genetics.med.harvard.edu
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The limit of detection in these experiments is based on the inherent error rate of the Illumina platform (up to 0.4%), which has previously been described for genome editing experiment analyzed by NGS71–73.”
From A high-fidelity Cas9 mutant delivered as a ribonucleoprotein complex enables efficient gene editing in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (2018) · cites this paper as [73]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210
Self-citation<tt>BLAT</tt> —The <tt>BLAST</tt> -Like Alignment Tool
Kent, W. J. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.229202 · Cited by 8,480
Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system
Hwang, W. Y., Fu, Y., Reyon, D., Maeder, M. L., Tsai, S. Q., Sander, J. D., Peterson, R. T., Yeh, J.-R. J., & Joung, J. K. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2501 · Cited by 2,937
RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells
Jinek, M., East, A., Cheng, A., Lin, S., Ma, E., & Doudna, J. (2013) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.00471 · Cited by 2,098
Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease
Cho, S. W., Kim, S., Kim, J. M., & Kim, J.-S. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2507 · Cited by 1,863
Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems
DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., Mali, P., Rios, X., Aach, J., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt135 · Cited by 1,566
Self-citationEfficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system
Feng, Z., Zhang, B., Ding, W., Liu, X., Yang, D., Wei, P., Cao, F., Zhu, S., Zhang, F., Mao, Y., et al. (2013) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2013.114 · Cited by 1,095
Niu, Y., Shen, B., Cui, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Wang, L., Kang, Y., Zhao, X., Si, W., Li, W., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.027 · Cited by 1,033
Orthogonal Cas9 proteins for RNA-guided gene regulation and editing
Esvelt, K. M., Mali, P., Braff, J. L., Moosburner, M., Yaung, S. J., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2681 · Cited by 786
Self-citationHeritable gene targeting in the mouse and rat using a CRISPR-Cas system
Li, D., Qiu, Z., Shao, Y., Chen, Y., Guan, Y., Liu, M., Li, Y., Wang, L., Wang, L., Lu, X., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2661 · Cited by 653
Comparison of DNA Sequences with Protein Sequences
Pearson, W. R., Wood, T. C., Zhang, Z., & Miller, W. (1997) · Genomics · doi:10.1006/geno.1997.4995 · Cited by 601
Targeted genome editing in human cells with zinc finger nucleases constructed via modular assembly
Kim, H. J., Lee, H. J., Kim, H., Cho, S. W., & Kim, J.-S. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.089417.108 · Cited by 466
Optimization of scarless human stem cell genome editing
Yang, L., Güell, M., Byrne, S., Yang, J. L., Angeles, A. D. L., Mali, P., Aach, J., Kim-Kiselak, C., Briggs, A. W., Rios, X., et al. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt555 · Cited by 384
Self-citationHighly Efficient Genome Modifications Mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 in Drosophila
Yu, Z., Ren, M., Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Rong, Y. S., Jiao, R., & Gao, G. (2013) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.113.153825 · Cited by 351
Mutation detection using Surveyor™ nuclease
Qiu, P., Shandilya, H., D'Alessio, J. M., O’Connor, K. C., Durocher, J. A., & Gerard, G. F. (2004) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/04364pf01 · Cited by 299
Huang, M. C., Cheong, W. C., Lim, L. S., & Li, M. (2012) · Electrophoresis · doi:10.1002/elps.201100460 · Cited by 40
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Clear, 2013, 2013 runners-up. Genetic microsurgery for the masses, Science, 342, 1434
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9
Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1258096 · Cited by 7,062
Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition
Brinkman, E. K., Chen, T., Amendola, M., & van Steensel, B. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku936 · Cited by 2,390
CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis
Clement, K., Rees, H. A., Canver, M. C., Gehrke, J. M., Farouni, R., Hsu, J. Y., Cole, M. A., Liu, D. R., Joung, J. K., Bauer, D. E., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0032-3 · Cited by 1,656
Vakulskas, C. A., Dever, D. P., Rettig, G. R., Turk, R., Jacobi, A. M., Collingwood, M. A., Bode, N. M., McNeill, M. S., Yan, S., Camarena, J., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0137-0 · Cited by 782
Inactivation of porcine endogenous retrovirus in pigs using CRISPR-Cas9
Niu, D., Wei, H.-J., Lin, L., George, H., Wang, T., Lee, I.-H., Zhao, H.-Y., Wang, Y., Kan, Y., Shrock, E., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan4187 · Cited by 717
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Güell, M., Yang, L., & Church, G. M.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Church, George M.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-07-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2968-2970
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- PMC
- PMC4184265
- OpenAlex
- W2161871693
- Semantic Scholar
- 513d19c6d364f6a5d5c30c3a2edd41581cc2f9b0
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Human Genome Research Institute (P50HG005550, HG005550)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- CRISPR gene editing, indels, homologous recombination, next-generation sequencing data analysis, web-based analysis tool
- MeSH terms
- Alleles, Genetic Engineering, Humans, User-Computer Interface, Genome, Human, Genomics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
