The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
LoRDEC: accurate and efficient long read error correction
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: PacBio single molecule real-time sequencing is a third-generation sequencing technique producing long reads, with comparatively lower throughput and higher error rate. Errors include numerous indels and complicate downstream analysis like mapping or de novo assembly. A hybrid strategy that takes advantage of the high accuracy of second-generation short reads has been proposed for correcting long reads. Mapping of short reads on long reads provides sufficient coverage to eliminate up to 99% of errors, however, at the expense of prohibitive running times and considerable amounts of disk and memory space. Results : We present LoRDEC, a hybrid error correction method that builds a succinct de Bruijn graph representing the short reads, and seeks a corrective sequence for each erroneous region in the long reads by traversing chosen paths in the graph. In comparison, LoRDEC is at least six times faster and requires at least 93% less memory or disk space than available tools, while achieving comparable accuracy. Availability and implementaion : LoRDEC is written in C++, tested on Linux platforms and freely available at http://atgc.lirmm.fr/lordec . Contact: lordec@lirmm.fr . Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Navarro, G., & Mäkinen, V. (2007) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1216370.1216372 · Cited by 735
Improving PacBio Long Read Accuracy by Short Read Alignment
Au, K. F., Underwood, J. G., Lee, L., & Wong, W. H. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046679 · Cited by 335
Cited by
Weirather, J. L., de Cesare, M., Wang, Y., Piazza, P., Sebastiano, V., Wang, X.-J., Buck, D., & Au, K. F. (2017) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.10571.2 · Cited by 418
Sahraeian, S. M. E., Mohiyuddin, M., Sebra, R., Tilgner, H., Afshar, P. T., Au, K. F., Bani Asadi, N., Gerstein, M. B., Wong, W. H., Snyder, M. P., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00050-4 · Cited by 376
Ye, C., Hill, C. M., Wu, S., Ruan, J., & Ma, Z. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep31900 · Cited by 304
GraphAligner: rapid and versatile sequence-to-graph alignment
Rautiainen, M., & Marschall, T. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02157-2 · Cited by 242
A comprehensive evaluation of long read error correction methods
Zhang, H., Jain, C., & Aluru, S. (2020) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-020-07227-0 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Salmela, L., & Rivals, E.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-08-26
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3506-3514
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2160177274
- Cited by
- 844
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.