Cited by 173Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic diversity and population structure

Genome measures used for quality control are dependent on gene function and ancestry

Open access
Wang, Jing, Raskin, Leon, Samuels, David C., Shyr, Yu, Guo, Yan·2015·Bioinformatics

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The transition/transversion (Ti/Tv) ratio and heterozygous/nonreference-homozygous (het/nonref-hom) ratio have been commonly computed in genetic studies as a quality control (QC) measurement. Additionally, these two ratios are helpful in our understanding of the patterns of DNA sequence evolution. RESULTS: To thoroughly understand these two genomic measures, we performed a study using 1000 Genomes Project (1000G) released genotype data (N=1092). An additional two datasets (N=581 and N=6) were used to validate our findings from the 1000G dataset. We compared the two ratios among continental ancestry, genome regions and gene functionality. We found that the Ti/Tv ratio can be used as a quality indicator for single nucleotide polymorphisms inferred from high-throughput sequencing data. The Ti/Tv ratio varies greatly by genome region and functionality, but not by ancestry. The het/nonref-hom ratio varies greatly by ancestry, but not by genome regions and functionality. Furthermore, extreme guanine + cytosine content (either high or low) is negatively associated with the Ti/Tv ratio magnitude. Thus, when performing QC assessment using these two measures, care must be taken to apply the correct thresholds based on ancestry and genome region. Failure to take these considerations into account at the QC stage will bias any following analysis. CONTACT: yan.guo@vanderbilt.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu668

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Repeating the analyses using only transversion SNPs found no indication of systematic bias in the Sidon individuals' genetic patterns.

    “To test this, we repeated the analyses using only transversion SNPs, which are less prone to characteristic ancient DNA errors, but found no indication of systematic bias (Wang et al., 2015).”

    From The Genomic History of the Bronze Age Southern Levant (2020) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2015

    The Introduction defines transversion SNPs, and the Discussion describes transition/transversion ratios as a sequencing quality-control measure. Neither section addresses characteristic ancient-DNA errors or Sidon individuals. The repeated analysis and its finding of no systematic bias are presented in the citing sentence as the citing authors’ own work, not Wang et al.’s. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Citation classic - use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Cc/Art Human. 1987:20–20. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., Raskin, L., Samuels, D. C., Shyr, Y., & Guo, Y.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Shyr, Yu
  • Guo, Yan
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2014-10-08
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
318-323
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2127495773
Cited by
173
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30 CA 68485, R01CA125558, R01CA148667, U01CA163056, R01CA118229, R01CA64266, R00CA158141, R01CA158473, P30CA068485)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
genotype quality control, transition/transversion ratio, single nucleotide polymorphisms, 1000 Genomes Project, continental ancestry, gene function, genomic regions, GC content, DNA sequence evolution, sequencing data quality
MeSH terms
Genotype, Humans, Phenotype, Quality Control, Genome, Human, Evolution, Molecular, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review