The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NgsRelate: a software tool for estimating pairwise relatedness from next-generation sequencing data
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Pairwise relatedness estimation is important in many contexts such as disease mapping and population genetics. However, all existing estimation methods are based on called genotypes, which is not ideal for next-generation sequencing (NGS) data of low depth from which genotypes cannot be called with high certainty. Results: We present a software tool, NgsRelate, for estimating pairwise relatedness from NGS data. It provides maximum likelihood estimates that are based on genotype likelihoods instead of genotypes and thereby takes the inherent uncertainty of the genotypes into account. Using both simulated and real data, we show that NgsRelate provides markedly better estimates for low-depth NGS data than two state-of-the-art genotype-based methods. Availability: NgsRelate is implemented in C++ and is available under the GNU license at www.popgen.dk/software. Contact: ida@binf.ku.dk Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11632 · Cited by 7,711
Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations
The International HapMap 3 Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09298 · Cited by 3,026
ANGSD: Analysis of Next Generation Sequencing Data
Korneliussen, T. S., Albrechtsen, A., & Nielsen, R. (2014) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-014-0356-4 · Cited by 2,982
Self-citation
Cited by
Estimating genetic kin relationships in prehistoric populations
Monroy Kuhn, J. M., Jakobsson, M., & Günther, T. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195491 · Cited by 330
A beginner's guide to low‐coverage whole genome sequencing for population genomics
Lou, R. N., Jacobs, A., Wilder, A. P., & Therkildsen, N. O. (2021) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.16077 · Cited by 334
Terminal Pleistocene Alaskan genome reveals first founding population of Native Americans
Moreno-Mayar, J. V., Potter, B. A., Vinner, L., Steinrücken, M., Rasmussen, S., Terhorst, J., Kamm, J. A., Albrechtsen, A., Malaspinas, A.-S., Sikora, M., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25173 · Cited by 316
Ancient genomes show social and reproductive behavior of early Upper Paleolithic foragers
Sikora, M., Seguin-Orlando, A., Sousa, V. C., Albrechtsen, A., Korneliussen, T., Ko, A., Rasmussen, S., Dupanloup, I., Nigst, P. R., Bosch, M. D., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao1807 · Cited by 312
Self-citationAncient genomes revisit the ancestry of domestic and Przewalski’s horses
Gaunitz, C., Fages, A., Hanghøj, K., Albrechtsen, A., Khan, N., Schubert, M., Seguin-Orlando, A., Owens, I. J., Felkel, S., Bignon-Lau, O., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao3297 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Korneliussen, T. S., & Moltke, I.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-08-30
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 4009-4011
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2115388502
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NgsRelate: a software tool for estimating pairwise relatedness from next-generation sequencing data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv509
- The paper
- Korneliussen, T. S., & Moltke, I. (2015). NgsRelate: a software tool for estimating pairwise relatedness from next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv509
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.