Cited by 34Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksComputational Drug Discovery Methods

TIN-X: target importance and novelty explorer

Open access
Cannon, Daniel C, Yang, Jeremy J, Mathias, Stephen L, Ursu, Oleg, Mani, Subramani, Waller, Anna, Schürer, Stephan C, Jensen, Lars Juhl +3 more·2017·Bioinformatics

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The increasing amount of peer-reviewed manuscripts requires the development of specific mining tools to facilitate the visual exploration of evidence linking diseases and proteins. RESULTS: We developed TIN-X, the Target Importance and Novelty eXplorer, to visualize the association between proteins and diseases, based on text mining data processed from scientific literature. In the current implementation, TIN-X supports exploration of data for G-protein coupled receptors, kinases, ion channels, and nuclear receptors. TIN-X supports browsing and navigating across proteins and diseases based on ontology classes, and displays a scatter plot with two proposed new bibliometric statistics: Importance and Novelty. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://www.newdrugtargets.org. CONTACT: cbologa@salud.unm.edu.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx200

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cannon, D. C., Yang, J. J., Mathias, S. L., Ursu, O., Mani, S., Waller, A., Schürer, S. C., Jensen, L. J., Sklar, L. A., Bologa, C. G., & Oprea, T. I.
Affiliations
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Bologa, Cristian G
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2017-04-07
Volume
33
Issue
16
Pages
2601-2603
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2604190529
Cited by
34
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (U54 CA189205-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
text mining, scientific literature mining, G protein-coupled receptors, kinases, ion channels, nuclear receptors, ontology classes, interactive visualization
MeSH terms
Computer Graphics, Disease, Humans, Ion Channels, Phosphotransferases, Software, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Data Mining, Biological Ontologies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review