Cited by 144Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Diseases 2.0: a weekly updated database of disease–gene associations from text mining and data integration

Open access
Grissa, Dhouha, Junge, Alexander, Oprea, Tudor I, Jensen, Lars Juhl·2022·Database

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The scientific knowledge about which genes are involved in which diseases grows rapidly, which makes it difficult to keep up with new publications and genetics datasets. The DISEASES database aims to provide a comprehensive overview by systematically integrating and assigning confidence scores to evidence for disease–gene associations from curated databases, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and automatic text mining of the biomedical literature. Here, we present a major update to this resource, which greatly increases the number of associations from all these sources. This is especially true for the text-mined associations, which have increased by at least 9-fold at all confidence cutoffs. We show that this dramatic increase is primarily due to adding full-text articles to the text corpus, secondarily due to improvements to both the disease and gene dictionaries used for named entity recognition, and only to a very small extent due to the growth in number of PubMed abstracts. DISEASES now also makes use of a new GWAS database, Target Illumination by GWAS Analytics, which considerably increased the number of GWAS-derived disease–gene associations. DISEASES itself is also integrated into several other databases and resources, including GeneCards/MalaCards, Pharos/Target Central Resource Database and the Cytoscape stringApp. All data in DISEASES are updated on a weekly basis and is available via a web interface at https://diseases.jensenlab.org, from where it can also be downloaded under open licenses. Database URL: https://diseases.jensenlab.org

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/database/baac019

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Automated systems that digest large sets of data using named entity recognition are an integral part of public domain databases such as DISEASES, STRING, OpenTargets, and Pharos.

    “Automated systems that digest large sets of data using named entity recognition, NER (18), are an integral part of public domain databases, for example, DISEASES for gene-disease associations (19); STRING for protein-protein interactions (20); and OpenTargets (21) and Pharos (22) for complex disease-protein-drug annotations, to name a few.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [31]Doǧan R.I., Wilbur W.J. and Comeau D.C. (2014) BioC and simplified use of the PMC open access dataset for biomedical text mining. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Building and Evaluating Resources for Health and Biomedical Text Processing.
  2. [41]Rouillard A.D., Gundersen G.W., Fernandez N.F. et al. (2016) The harmonizome: a collection of processed datasets gathered to serve and mine knowledge about genes and proteins. Database, 2016, baw100. doi: 10.1093/database/baw100 PMC4930834 27374120 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grissa, D., Junge, A., Oprea, T. I., & Jensen, L. J.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Jensen, Lars Juhl
Venue
Database
Published
2022-01-01
Volume
2022
ISSN
1758-0463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226064195
Cited by
144
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8
FWCI
8.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Database (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Novo Nordisk (NNF14CC0001)
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF 14CC0001)
  • National Institutes of Health (U24 224370)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
gene-disease association, genome-wide association study, named entity recognition, confidence scores, data integration, gene-disease networks, GeneCards, Pharo
MeSH terms
Databases, Factual, Genome-Wide Association Study, Data Mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review