Diseases 2.0: a weekly updated database of disease–gene associations from text mining and data integration
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The scientific knowledge about which genes are involved in which diseases grows rapidly, which makes it difficult to keep up with new publications and genetics datasets. The DISEASES database aims to provide a comprehensive overview by systematically integrating and assigning confidence scores to evidence for disease–gene associations from curated databases, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and automatic text mining of the biomedical literature. Here, we present a major update to this resource, which greatly increases the number of associations from all these sources. This is especially true for the text-mined associations, which have increased by at least 9-fold at all confidence cutoffs. We show that this dramatic increase is primarily due to adding full-text articles to the text corpus, secondarily due to improvements to both the disease and gene dictionaries used for named entity recognition, and only to a very small extent due to the growth in number of PubMed abstracts. DISEASES now also makes use of a new GWAS database, Target Illumination by GWAS Analytics, which considerably increased the number of GWAS-derived disease–gene associations. DISEASES itself is also integrated into several other databases and resources, including GeneCards/MalaCards, Pharos/Target Central Resource Database and the Cytoscape stringApp. All data in DISEASES are updated on a weekly basis and is available via a web interface at https://diseases.jensenlab.org, from where it can also be downloaded under open licenses. Database URL: https://diseases.jensenlab.org
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Automated systems that digest large sets of data using named entity recognition are an integral part of public domain databases such as DISEASES, STRING, OpenTargets, and Pharos.
“Automated systems that digest large sets of data using named entity recognition, NER (18), are an integral part of public domain databases, for example, DISEASES for gene-disease associations (19); STRING for protein-protein interactions (20); and OpenTargets (21) and Pharos (22) for complex disease-protein-drug annotations, to name a few.”
From Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery: Are We There Yet? (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Szklarczyk, D., Gable, A. L., Lyon, D., Junge, A., Wyder, S., Huerta-Cepas, J., Simonovic, M., Doncheva, N. T., Morris, J. H., Bork, P., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1131 · Cited by 17,749 · see citing works
Self-citationUniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase
Apweiler, R. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh131 · Cited by 7,535 · see citing works
The GeneCards suite: from gene data mining to disease genome sequence analyses
Stelzer, G., Rosen, N., Plaschkes, I., Zimmerman, S., Twik, M., Fishilevich, S., Stein, T. I., Nudel, R., Lieder, I., Mazor, Y., et al. (2016) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/cpbi.5 · Cited by 5,550 · see citing works
Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classification
Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., & Mikolov, T. (2017) · Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers · doi:10.18653/v1/e17-2068 · Cited by 4,545 · see citing works
UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase
The UniProt Consortium (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1099 · Cited by 4,436 · see citing works
Buniello, A., MacArthur, J. A. L., Cerezo, M., Harris, L. W., Hayhurst, J., Malangone, C., McMahon, A., Morales, J., Mountjoy, E., Sollis, E., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1120 · Cited by 4,000 · see citing works
The DisGeNET knowledge platform for disease genomics: 2019 update
Piñero, J., Ramírez-Anguita, J. M., Saüch-Pitarch, J., Ronzano, F., Centeno, E., Sanz, F., & Furlong, L. I. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1021 · Cited by 2,639 · see citing works
Cytoscape StringApp: Network Analysis and Visualization of Proteomics Data
Doncheva, N. T., Morris, J. H., Gorodkin, J., & Jensen, L. J. (2018) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00702 · Cited by 2,316 · see citing works
Self-citationUniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase
The UniProt Consortium (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky092 · Cited by 2,043 · see citing works
Rouillard, A. D., Gundersen, G. W., Fernandez, N. F., Wang, Z., Monteiro, C. D., McDermott, M. G., & Ma’ayan, A. (2016) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baw100 · Cited by 1,515 · see citing works
A compendium of mutational cancer driver genes
Martínez-Jiménez, F., Muiños, F., Sentís, I., Deu-Pons, J., Reyes-Salazar, I., Arnedo-Pac, C., Mularoni, L., Pich, O., Bonet, J., Kranas, H., et al. (2020) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-020-0290-x · Cited by 1,278 · see citing works
Human genetic variation and its contribution to complex traits
Frazer, K. A., Murray, S. S., Schork, N. J., & Topol, E. J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2554 · Cited by 1,073 · see citing works
OMIM.org: leveraging knowledge across phenotype–gene relationships
Amberger, J., Bocchini, C. A., Scott, A., & Hamosh, A. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Res. · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1151 · Cited by 977 · see citing works
The Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC)
Forbes, S. A., Bhamra, G., Bamford, S., Dawson, E., Kok, C. Y., Clements, J., Menzies, A. H., Teague, J. W., Futreal, P. A., & Stratton, M. R. (2008) · Current Protocols in Human Genetics · doi:10.1002/0471142905.hg1011s57 · Cited by 899 · see citing works
Flicek, P., Ahmed, I., Amode, M. R., Barrell, D. G., Beal, K. M., Brent, S., Carvalho‐Silva, D., Clapham, P., Coates, G. M. P., Fairley, S., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1236 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
A literature network of human genes for high-throughput analysis of gene expression
Jenssen, T.-K., Lægreid, A., Komorowski, J., & Hovig, E. J. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/88213 · Cited by 839 · see citing works
Rappaport, N., Twik, M., Plaschkes, I., Nudel, R., Stein, T. I., Levitt, J., Gershoni, M., Morrey, C. P., Safran, M., & Lancet, D. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1012 · Cited by 684 · see citing works
DISEASES: Text mining and data integration of disease–gene associations
Pletscher-Frankild, S., Pallejà, A., Tsafou, K., Binder, J. X., & Jensen, L. J. (2015) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.11.020 · Cited by 591 · see citing works
Self-citationHutchins, B. I., Yuan, X., Anderson, J. M., & Santangelo, G. M. (2016) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002541 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Open Targets Platform: supporting systematic drug–target identification and prioritisation
Ochoa, D., Hercules, A., Carmona, M., Süveges, D., Gonzalez‐Uriarte, A., Malangone, C., Miranda, A., Fumis, L., Carvalho‐Silva, D., Spitzer, M., et al. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1027 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
A literature network of human genes for high-throughput analysis of gene expression
Jenssen, T.-K., Lægreid, A., Komorowski, J., et al. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0501-21 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Distinct Global Brain Dynamics and Spatiotemporal Organization of the Salience Network
Chen, T., Cai, W., Ryali, S., Supekar, K., & Menon, V. (2016) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002469 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Human Disease Ontology 2018 update: classification, content and workflow expansion
Schriml, L. M., Mitraka, E., Munro, J. B., Tauber, B., Schor, M., Nickle, L., Felix, V., Jeng, L. J. B., Bearer, C. F., Lichenstein, R., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1032 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science
Else, H., & Van Noorden, R. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00733-5 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Genenames.org: the HGNC resources in 2013
Gray, K. A., Daugherty, L. C., Gordon, S. M., Seal, R. L., Wright, M. W., & Bruford, E. A. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1066 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
The SPECIES and ORGANISMS Resources for Fast and Accurate Identification of Taxonomic Names in Text
Pafilis, E., Frankild, S. P., Fanini, L., Faulwetter, S., Pavloudi, C., Vasileiadou, A., Arvanitidis, C., & Jensen, L. J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065390 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Self-citationWestergaard, D., Stærfeldt, H., Tønsberg, C., Jensen, L. J., & Brunak, S. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005962 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, M. J., Liu, Z., Wang, P., Wong, M. P., Nelson, M. R., Kocher, J., Yeager, M., Sham, P. C., Chanock, S. J., Xia, Z., et al. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1317 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
FACTA: a text search engine for finding associated biomedical concepts
Tsuruoka, Y., Tsujii, J., & Ananiadou, S. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn469 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
TCRD and pharos 2021: mining the human proteome for disease biology
Sheils, T. K., Mathias, S. L., Kelleher, K. J., Siramshetty, V. B., Nguyen, D.-T., Bologa, C. G., Jensen, L. J., Vidović, D., Koleti, A., Schürer, S. C., et al. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa993 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationGeneshot: search engine for ranking genes from arbitrary text queries
Lachmann, A., Schilder, B. M., Wojciechowicz, M. L., Torre, D., Kuleshov, M. V., Keenan, A. B., & Ma’ayan, A. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz393 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
PMC text mining subset in BioC: about three million full-text articles and growing
Comeau, D. C., Wei, C.-H., Islamaj, R., et al. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz070 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Beck, T., Shorter, T., & Brookes, A. J. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz895 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Simmons, M., Singhal, A., & Lu, Z. (2016) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-1503-8_7 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
The research on gene-disease association based on text-mining of PubMed
Zhou, J., & Fu, B.-Q. (2018) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-018-2048-y · Cited by 53 · see citing works
DistiLD Database: diseases and traits in linkage disequilibrium blocks
Pallejá, A., Horn, H., Eliasson, S., & Jensen, L. J. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr899 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationTIN-X: target importance and novelty explorer
Cannon, D. C., Yang, J. J., Mathias, S. L., Ursu, O., Mani, S., Waller, A., Schürer, S. C., Jensen, L. J., Sklar, L. A., Bologa, C. G., et al. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx200 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationSynthetic protein alignments by CCMgen quantify noise in residue-residue contact prediction
Vorberg, S., Seemayer, S., & Söding, J. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006526 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
AmyCo: the amyloidoses collection
Nastou, K. C., Nasi, G. I., Tsiolaki, P. L., et al. (2019) · Amyloid · doi:10.1080/13506129.2019.1603143 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
TIGA: target illumination GWAS analytics
Yang, J. J., Grissa, D., Lambert, C. G., Bologa, C., Mathias, S. L., Waller, A., Wild, D. J., Jensen, L. J., & Oprea, T. I. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab427 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationA single ‘paper mill’ appears to have churned out 400 papers, sleuths find
Chawla, D. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb4930 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
‘Genetics Home Reference’: Helping Patients Understand the Role of Genetics in Health and Disease
Fomous, C., Mitchell, J. A., & McCray, A. T. (2006) · Public Health Genomics · doi:10.1159/000094477 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Literature Mining and Ontology based Analysis of Host-Brucella Gene–Gene Interaction Network
Karadenız, İ., Hur, J., He, Y. O., et al. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01386 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
A Novel Text-Mining Approach for Retrieving Pharmacogenomics Associations From the Literature
Pandi, M., van der Spek, P. J., Koromina, M., & Patrinos, G. P. (2020) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.602030 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Mining Biological Networks from Full-Text Articles
Czarnecki, J., & Shepherd, A. J. (2014) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0709-0_8 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Qin, X., Yao, X., & Xia, J. (2021) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/28247 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [31]Doǧan R.I., Wilbur W.J. and Comeau D.C. (2014) BioC and simplified use of the PMC open access dataset for biomedical text mining. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Building and Evaluating Resources for Health and Biomedical Text Processing.
- [41]Rouillard A.D., Gundersen G.W., Fernandez N.F. et al. (2016) The harmonizome: a collection of processed datasets gathered to serve and mine knowledge about genes and proteins. Database, 2016, baw100. doi: 10.1093/database/baw100 PMC4930834 27374120 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery: Are We There Yet?
Hasselgren, C., & Oprea, T. I. (2024) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-040323-040828 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
“Centered on the main node, “Target”, nodes listed clockwise are as follows: Tissue; Cell_type; Panther, Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships, a protein classification scheme(57); Reactome, a pathways database (58); Jensen DISEASES (19); OMIM, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database(59); HPO, human…”
BackgroundSelf-citationPharos 2023: an integrated resource for the understudied human proteome
Kelleher, K. J., Sheils, T. K., Mathias, S. L., Yang, J. J., Metzger, V. T., Siramshetty, V. B., Nguyen, D.-T., Jensen, L. J., Vidović, D., Schürer, S. C., et al. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1033 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Self-citationPhan, A., Joshi, P., Kadelka, C., & Friedberg, I. (2025) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baaf036 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Liu, X., Chen, Y.-W., Xu, X., Smith, D., & Fan, F. (2026) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfag021 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Grissa, D., Junge, A., Oprea, T. I., & Jensen, L. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Jensen, Lars Juhl
- Venue
- Database
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-01-01
- Volume
- 2022
- ISSN
- 1758-0463 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9216524
- OpenAlex
- W4226064195
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8
- FWCI
- 8.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Database (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk (NNF14CC0001)
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF 14CC0001)
- National Institutes of Health (U24 224370)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- gene-disease association, genome-wide association study, named entity recognition, confidence scores, data integration, gene-disease networks, GeneCards, Pharo
- MeSH terms
- Databases, Factual, Genome-Wide Association Study, Data Mining
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review