Cited by 9Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisScientific Computing and Data ManagementModeling and Simulation Systems

Reproducible and flexible simulation experiments with ML-Rules and SESSL

Open access
Warnke, T, Helms, T, Uhrmacher, A M·2018·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Summary: The modeling language ML-Rules allows specifying and simulating complex systems biology models at multiple levels of organization. The development of such simulation models involves a wide variety of simulation experiments and the replicability of generated simulation results requires suitable means for documenting simulation experiments. Embedded domain-specific languages, such as SESSL, cater to both requirements. With SESSL, the user can integrate diverse simulation experimentation methods and third-party software components into an executable, readable simulation experiment specification. A newly developed SESSL binding for ML-Rules exploits these features of SESSL, opening up new possibilities for executing and documenting simulation experiments with ML-Rules models. Availability and implementation: ML-Rules is implemented in Java, SESSL and its bindings are implemented in Scala. The source code is available under open-source licenses: ML-Rules git.informatik.uni-rostock.de/mosi/mlrules2 ML-Rules Quickstart (Graphical Editor) git.informatik.uni-rostock.de/mosi/mlrules2-quickstart SESSL git.informatik.uni-rostock.de/mosi/sessl and sessl.org SESSL Quickstart (Experiment Template) git.informatik.uni-rostock.de/mosi/sessl-quickstart Furthermore, Maven-compatible compiled packages of ML-Rules, SESSL, and the SESSL bindings are available from the Maven Central Repository at maven.org (org.sessl:* and org.jamesii: mlrules). Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx741

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reason for the few rule-based models might be partly because support for thorough experimentation with rule-based models including calibration and validation has only become available during the last decade [97-99].

    “The reason for this might be partly because support for thorough experimentation with rule-based models including calibration and validation has only become available during the last decade [97–99].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warnke, T., Helms, T., & Uhrmacher, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Rostock (DE)
Corresponding author
Warnke, T
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2017-11-23
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
1424-1427
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2770364859
Cited by
9
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (UH 66/13)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation Systems
Keywords
simulation experiments, reproducibility, domain-specific languages, systems biology modeling, executable specifications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review