The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring phylogenetic signal between categorical traits and phylogenies
Abstract
Motivation: Determining whether a trait and phylogeny share some degree of phylogenetic signal is a flagship goal in evolutionary biology. Signatures of phylogenetic signal can assist the resolution of a broad range of evolutionary questions regarding the tempo and mode of phenotypic evolution. However, despite the considerable number of strategies to measure it, few and limited approaches exist for categorical traits. Here, we used the concept of Shannon entropy and propose the δ statistic for evaluating the degree of phylogenetic signal between a phylogeny and categorical traits. Results: We validated δ as a measure of phylogenetic signal: the higher the δ-value the higher the degree of phylogenetic signal between a given tree and a trait. Based on simulated data we proposed a threshold-based classification test to pinpoint cases of phylogenetic signal. The assessment of the test’s specificity and sensitivity suggested that the δ approach should only be applied to 20 or more species. We have further tested the performance of δ in scenarios of branch length and topology uncertainty, unbiased and biased trait evolution and trait saturation. Our results showed that δ may be applied in a wide range of phylogenetic contexts. Finally, we investigated our method in 14 360 mammalian gene trees and found that olfactory receptor genes are significantly associated with the mammalian activity patterns, a result that is congruent with expectations and experiments from the literature. Our application shows that δ can successfully detect molecular signatures of phenotypic evolution. We conclude that δ represents a useful measure of phylogenetic signal since many phenotypes can only be measured in categories. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/mrborges23/delta_statistic. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The delta statistic calculates phylogenetic signal for categorical traits.
“Ribeiro and Borges presented the delta statistic for calculating phylogenetic signal for categorical traits (Borges et al. 2019; Ribeiro et al. 2023).”
From RERconverge Expansion: Using Relative Evolutionary Rates to Study Complex Categorical Trait Evolution (2024) · cites this paper as Borges et al. 2019
The delta statistic has been successfully applied to find genes associated with the evolution of mammalian sleep patterns.
“This statistic has been successfully applied to find genes associated with the evolution of mammalian sleep patterns (Borges et al. 2019).”
From RERconverge Expansion: Using Relative Evolutionary Rates to Study Complex Categorical Trait Evolution (2024) · cites this paper as Borges et al. 2019
The delta statistic does not use evolutionary rates.
“the delta statistic does not use evolutionary rates”
From RERconverge Expansion: Using Relative Evolutionary Rates to Study Complex Categorical Trait Evolution (2024) · cites this paper as Borges et al. 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.-F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W., & Gascuel, O. (2010) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq010 · Cited by 18,376
A review of long-branch attraction
Bergsten, J. (2005) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00059.x · Cited by 1,162
Evolutionary radiation of visual and olfactory brain systems in primates, bats and insectivores
Barton, R. A., Purvis, A., & Harvey, P. H. (1995) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1995.0076 · Cited by 352
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Abouheif, 1999, A method for testing the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data, Evol. Ecol. Res, 1, 895
- Antunes, 2008, The evolutionary dynamics of the lion panthera leo revealed by host and viral population genomics, PLoS Genet, 4, e1000251., 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000251 · DOI
- Bennie, 2014, Biogeography of time partitioning in mammals, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 13727, 10.1073/pnas.1216063110 · DOI
- Blomberg, 2003, Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile, Evolution, 57, 717
- Borges, 2018, Adaptive genomic evolution of opsins reveals that early mammals flourished in nocturnal environments, BMC Genomics, 19, 121., 10.1186/s12864-017-4417-8 · DOI
- Burleigh, 2004, Phylogenetic signal in nucleotide data from seed plants: implications for resolving the seed plant tree of life, Am. J. Bot, 91, 1599, 10.3732/ajb.91.10.1599 · DOI
- Douzery, 2014, OrthoMaM v8: a database of orthologous exons and coding sequences for comparative genomics in mammals, Mol. Biol. Evol, 31, 1923, 10.1093/molbev/msu132 · DOI
- Dunn, 2005, Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history, Science, 309, 2072, 10.1126/science.1114615 · DOI
- Eden, 2009, GOrilla: a tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists, BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 48., 10.1186/1471-2105-10-48 · DOI · Paper page
- Felsenstein, 2005, Using the quantitative genetic threshold model for inferences between and within species, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci, 360, 1427, 10.1098/rstb.2005.1669 · DOI
- Fritz, 2010, Selectivity in mammalian extinction risk and threat types: a new measure of phylogenetic signal strength in binary traits, Conserv. Biol, 24, 1042, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01455.x · DOI
- Gilbert, 2007, Phylogenetic signal in plant pathogen-host range, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 4979, 10.1073/pnas.0607968104 · DOI
- Hayden, 2010, Ecological adaptation determines functional mammalian olfactory subgenomes, Genome Res, 20, 1, 10.1101/gr.099416.109 · DOI
- Huelsenbeck, 2001, MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees, Bioinformatics, 17, 754, 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · DOI · Paper page
- Hughes, 2018, The birth and death of olfactory receptor gene families in mammalian niche adaptation, Mol. Biol. Evol, 35, 1390, 10.1093/molbev/msy028 · DOI
- Kaehler, 2015, Genetic distance for a general non-stationary Markov substitution process, Syst. Biol, 64, 281, 10.1093/sysbio/syu106 · DOI
- Kamilar, 2013, Phylogenetic signal in primate behaviour, ecology and life history, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci, 368, 20120341, 10.1098/rstb.2012.0341 · DOI
- Khan, 2015, Olfactory receptor subgenomes linked with Broad Ecological Adaptations in Sauropsida, Mol. Biol. Evol., 32, 2832, 10.1093/molbev/msv155 · DOI
- Kishida, 2008, Pattern of the divergence of olfactory receptor genes during tetrapod evolution, PLoS One, 3, e2385., 10.1371/journal.pone.0002385 · DOI
- Losos, 2008, Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species, Ecol. Lett, 11, 995, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01229.x · DOI
- McAuliffe, 2004, Multiple-sequence functional annotation and the generalized hidden Markov phylogeny, Bioinformatics, 20, 1850, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth153 · DOI
- Moran, 1950, Notes in continuous stochastic phenomena, Biometrika, 37, 17, 10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17 · DOI · Paper page
- Münkemüller, 2012, How to measure and test phylogenetic signal, Methods Ecol. Evol, 3, 743, 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00196.x · DOI
- Pagel, 1999, Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution, Nature, 401, 877, 10.1038/44766 · DOI · Paper page
- Paradis, 2004, APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language, Bioinformatics, 20, 289, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · DOI · Paper page
- Pearman, 2008, Niche dynamics in space and time, Trends Ecol. Evol, 23, 149, 10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.005 · DOI
- 2015, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
- Rheindt, 2004, Rapidly evolving traits and the comparative method: how important is testing for phylogenetic signal?, Evol. Ecol. Res, 6, 377
- Schliep, 2011, phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R, Bioinformatics, 27, 592, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq706 · DOI
- Shannon, 1948, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst. Tech. J, 27, 379, 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · DOI · Paper page
- Simmons, 2000, Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses, Syst. Biol, 49, 369, 10.1093/sysbio/49.2.369 · DOI
- Thuiller, 2011, Consequences of climate change on the tree of life in Europe, Nature, 470, 531, 10.1038/nature09705 · DOI
- Tsagkogeorga, 2017, Comparative genomics reveals contraction in olfactory receptor genes in bats, Sci. Rep, 7, 259., 10.1038/s41598-017-00132-9 · DOI
- Walls, 1942, The Vertebrate Eye and Its Adaptive Radiation
- Wang, 2010, Comparative genomic analysis reveals more functional nasal chemoreceptors in nocturnal mammals than in diurnal mammals, Chin. Sci. Bull, 55, 3901, 10.1007/s11434-010-4202-4 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Redlich, R., Kowalczyk, A., Tene, M., Sestili, H. H., Foley, K., Saputra, E., Clark, N., Chikina, M., Meyer, W. K., & Pfenning, A. R. (2024) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msae210 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Borges, R., Machado, J. P., Gomes, C., Rocha, A. P., & Antunes, A.
- Affiliations
- CIIMAR/CIMAR, Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Matosinhos, Portugal
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto, FCUP, Porto, Portugal
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-10-25
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1862-1869
- ISSN
- 1367-4803
- 1367-4811
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Funders
- FCT (RB: SFRH/BD/79850/2011, SFRH/BD/71041/2010)
- CMUP (UID/MAT/00144/2013)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review