Cited by 144

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring phylogenetic signal between categorical traits and phylogenies

Borges, Rui, Machado, João Paulo, Gomes, Cidália, Rocha, Ana Paula, Antunes, Agostinho·2019·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Determining whether a trait and phylogeny share some degree of phylogenetic signal is a flagship goal in evolutionary biology. Signatures of phylogenetic signal can assist the resolution of a broad range of evolutionary questions regarding the tempo and mode of phenotypic evolution. However, despite the considerable number of strategies to measure it, few and limited approaches exist for categorical traits. Here, we used the concept of Shannon entropy and propose the δ statistic for evaluating the degree of phylogenetic signal between a phylogeny and categorical traits. Results: We validated δ as a measure of phylogenetic signal: the higher the δ-value the higher the degree of phylogenetic signal between a given tree and a trait. Based on simulated data we proposed a threshold-based classification test to pinpoint cases of phylogenetic signal. The assessment of the test’s specificity and sensitivity suggested that the δ approach should only be applied to 20 or more species. We have further tested the performance of δ in scenarios of branch length and topology uncertainty, unbiased and biased trait evolution and trait saturation. Our results showed that δ may be applied in a wide range of phylogenetic contexts. Finally, we investigated our method in 14 360 mammalian gene trees and found that olfactory receptor genes are significantly associated with the mammalian activity patterns, a result that is congruent with expectations and experiments from the literature. Our application shows that δ can successfully detect molecular signatures of phenotypic evolution. We conclude that δ represents a useful measure of phylogenetic signal since many phenotypes can only be measured in categories. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/mrborges23/delta_statistic. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty800

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Abouheif, 1999, A method for testing the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data, Evol. Ecol. Res, 1, 895
  2. Antunes, 2008, The evolutionary dynamics of the lion panthera leo revealed by host and viral population genomics, PLoS Genet, 4, e1000251., 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000251 · DOI
  3. Bennie, 2014, Biogeography of time partitioning in mammals, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 13727, 10.1073/pnas.1216063110 · DOI
  4. Blomberg, 2003, Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile, Evolution, 57, 717
  5. Borges, 2018, Adaptive genomic evolution of opsins reveals that early mammals flourished in nocturnal environments, BMC Genomics, 19, 121., 10.1186/s12864-017-4417-8 · DOI
  6. Burleigh, 2004, Phylogenetic signal in nucleotide data from seed plants: implications for resolving the seed plant tree of life, Am. J. Bot, 91, 1599, 10.3732/ajb.91.10.1599 · DOI
  7. Douzery, 2014, OrthoMaM v8: a database of orthologous exons and coding sequences for comparative genomics in mammals, Mol. Biol. Evol, 31, 1923, 10.1093/molbev/msu132 · DOI
  8. Dunn, 2005, Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history, Science, 309, 2072, 10.1126/science.1114615 · DOI
  9. Eden, 2009, GOrilla: a tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists, BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 48., 10.1186/1471-2105-10-48 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Felsenstein, 2005, Using the quantitative genetic threshold model for inferences between and within species, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci, 360, 1427, 10.1098/rstb.2005.1669 · DOI
  11. Fritz, 2010, Selectivity in mammalian extinction risk and threat types: a new measure of phylogenetic signal strength in binary traits, Conserv. Biol, 24, 1042, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01455.x · DOI
  12. Gilbert, 2007, Phylogenetic signal in plant pathogen-host range, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 4979, 10.1073/pnas.0607968104 · DOI
  13. Hayden, 2010, Ecological adaptation determines functional mammalian olfactory subgenomes, Genome Res, 20, 1, 10.1101/gr.099416.109 · DOI
  14. Huelsenbeck, 2001, MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees, Bioinformatics, 17, 754, 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hughes, 2018, The birth and death of olfactory receptor gene families in mammalian niche adaptation, Mol. Biol. Evol, 35, 1390, 10.1093/molbev/msy028 · DOI
  16. Kaehler, 2015, Genetic distance for a general non-stationary Markov substitution process, Syst. Biol, 64, 281, 10.1093/sysbio/syu106 · DOI
  17. Kamilar, 2013, Phylogenetic signal in primate behaviour, ecology and life history, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci, 368, 20120341, 10.1098/rstb.2012.0341 · DOI
  18. Khan, 2015, Olfactory receptor subgenomes linked with Broad Ecological Adaptations in Sauropsida, Mol. Biol. Evol., 32, 2832, 10.1093/molbev/msv155 · DOI
  19. Kishida, 2008, Pattern of the divergence of olfactory receptor genes during tetrapod evolution, PLoS One, 3, e2385., 10.1371/journal.pone.0002385 · DOI
  20. Losos, 2008, Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species, Ecol. Lett, 11, 995, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01229.x · DOI
  21. McAuliffe, 2004, Multiple-sequence functional annotation and the generalized hidden Markov phylogeny, Bioinformatics, 20, 1850, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth153 · DOI
  22. Moran, 1950, Notes in continuous stochastic phenomena, Biometrika, 37, 17, 10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Münkemüller, 2012, How to measure and test phylogenetic signal, Methods Ecol. Evol, 3, 743, 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00196.x · DOI
  24. Pagel, 1999, Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution, Nature, 401, 877, 10.1038/44766 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Paradis, 2004, APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language, Bioinformatics, 20, 289, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Pearman, 2008, Niche dynamics in space and time, Trends Ecol. Evol, 23, 149, 10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.005 · DOI
  27. 2015, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
  28. Rheindt, 2004, Rapidly evolving traits and the comparative method: how important is testing for phylogenetic signal?, Evol. Ecol. Res, 6, 377
  29. Schliep, 2011, phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R, Bioinformatics, 27, 592, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq706 · DOI
  30. Shannon, 1948, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst. Tech. J, 27, 379, 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. Simmons, 2000, Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses, Syst. Biol, 49, 369, 10.1093/sysbio/49.2.369 · DOI
  32. Thuiller, 2011, Consequences of climate change on the tree of life in Europe, Nature, 470, 531, 10.1038/nature09705 · DOI
  33. Tsagkogeorga, 2017, Comparative genomics reveals contraction in olfactory receptor genes in bats, Sci. Rep, 7, 259., 10.1038/s41598-017-00132-9 · DOI
  34. Walls, 1942, The Vertebrate Eye and Its Adaptive Radiation
  35. Wang, 2010, Comparative genomic analysis reveals more functional nasal chemoreceptors in nocturnal mammals than in diurnal mammals, Chin. Sci. Bull, 55, 3901, 10.1007/s11434-010-4202-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Borges, R., Machado, J. P., Gomes, C., Rocha, A. P., & Antunes, A.
Affiliations
  • CIIMAR/CIMAR, Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Matosinhos, Portugal
  • Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto, FCUP, Porto, Portugal
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2018-10-25
Volume
35
Issue
11
Pages
1862-1869
ISSN
  • 1367-4803
  • 1367-4811
Cited by
144
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • FCT (RB: SFRH/BD/79850/2011, SFRH/BD/71041/2010)
  • CMUP (UID/MAT/00144/2013)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review