Cited by 14Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 42 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

RERconverge Expansion: Using Relative Evolutionary Rates to Study Complex Categorical Trait Evolution

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Comparative genomics approaches seek to associate molecular evolution with the evolution of phenotypes across a phylogeny. Many of these methods lack the ability to analyze non-ordinal categorical traits with more than two categories. To address this limitation, we introduce an expansion to RERconverge that associates shifts in evolutionary rates with the convergent evolution of categorical traits. The categorical RERconverge expansion includes methods for performing categorical ancestral state reconstruction, statistical tests for associating relative evolutionary rates with categorical variables, and a new method for performing phylogeny-aware permutations, “permulations”, on categorical traits. We demonstrate our new method on a three-category diet phenotype, and we compare its performance to binary RERconverge analyses and two existing methods for comparative genomic analyses of categorical traits: phylogenetic simulations and a phylogenetic signal based method. We present an analysis of how the categorical permulations scale with the number of species and the number of categories included in the analysis. Our results show that our new categorical method outperforms phylogenetic simulations at identifying genes and enriched pathways significantly associated with the diet phenotypes and that the categorical ancestral state reconstruction drives an improvement in our ability to capture diet-related enriched pathways compared to binary RERconverge when implemented without user input on phenotype evolution. The categorical expansion to RERconverge will provide a strong foundation for applying the comparative method to categorical traits on larger data sets with more species and more complex trait evolution than have previously been analyzed.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper introduces a categorical expansion to RERconverge that infers ancestral categorical states with a continuous-time Markov model, tests relative evolutionary rates against multi-category phenotypes, and adapts permulations for categorical traits. Applied to mammalian diet, it outperforms phylogenetic simulations and captures diet-related pathways that binary pairwise analyses miss.

Key findings

  • Categorical RERconverge detected 1,086 genes with P < 0.05 using the omnibus test, compared with 142 genes for phylANOVA at the same 10,000 simulations/permulations; phylANOVA also had 0% of significantly enriched MGI pathways related to metabolism or digestive/liver/biliary systems in the carnivore/herbivore post hoc results, versus 8%–23% for binary or categorical RERconverge.
  • The categorical omnibus test found significant enrichment of the abnormal digestion pathway (permulation P = 9 × 10⁻⁴), while all categorical post hoc tests had permulation P ≥ 0.27 and all pairwise binary tests had permulation P ≥ 0.10; digestive tract development was enriched in the carnivore/herbivore categorical post hoc test (permulation P = 0.0011).
  • On 115 mammals and 19,137 gene trees, the all-rates-different model inferred the ancestral mammal as a carnivore, with 4 direct carnivore–herbivore transitions, 12 carnivore–omnivore transitions, and 19 herbivore–omnivore transitions.
  • PIEZO1 had a significant rate difference across diet categories (omnibus permulation P = 0.029); at human PIEZO1 residue 1,835, glycine was present in all but two of 29 carnivore lineages, versus 8 of 44 herbivore and 5 of 23 omnivore lineages.

Methods

  • The expansion adds maximum-likelihood ancestral state reconstruction using a continuous-time Markov model, categorical association tests (default nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis with post hoc Dunn tests; optional ANOVA with post hoc Tukey tests), and categorical permulations with rejection sampling, permutation of internal traits, and simulated-annealing reorganization.
  • Main data were coding sequence alignments from a 120-mammal whole-genome alignment, yielding 19,137 gene trees for 115 mammals with clearly assigned diet phenotypes from Walker’s Book of Mammals; the main analysis used three diet categories (carnivore, omnivore, herbivore), while six categories were used for permulation timing.
  • The method was compared with pairwise binary RERconverge strategies, phylANOVA, and the delta statistic, using 10,000 permulations or simulations and pathway enrichment analyses; runtimes were measured on a 2021 MacBook Pro with an Apple M1 Max chip.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the current rejection sampler becomes very slow for large trees with more than three categories, especially when phenotypes are highly clustered by phylogeny; permulation time increased exponentially with category number (y = x⁸·¹¹ − 223.66, R² = 0.567), from 7.2 s for two categories to 4,933 s for six categories, and the authors recommend 10% relaxation for four or more categories.
  • The authors state that results are explored for only one trait, that true ancestral phenotypes and evolutionary rates may remain unknown, and that functional validation and other tools such as Hyphy BUSTED-PH should be used to connect associations confidently with diet evolution.
  • Evident from the text: the main three-category analysis simplified the six-category diet data by treating insectivores as carnivores and some omnivores as carnivores, and the authors note that anthropivores are a poorly defined phenotype.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/msae210

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

3 of 42 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisereasoning

    RERconverge uses permulations, which generate null phenotype values using simulations restricted by the observed phenotype distribution to overcome the limitation of simulations.

    “RERconverge uses permulations, which generate null phenotype values using simulations restricted by the observed phenotype distribution to overcome that limitation of simulations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Saputra et al. 2021 source
  • Findingreasoning

    There is no corresponding group of internal branches with negative RERs assigned as omnivores-or any other category-in the categorical reconstruction.

    “There is no corresponding group of internal branches with negative RERs assigned as omnivores—or any other category—in the categorical reconstruction”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The distributions of permulation P-values for the carnivore/omnivore and omnivore/carnivore binary analyses differed the most from that of the corresponding categorical post hoc test.

    “We focused on the carnivore/omnivore and omnivore/carnivore binary analyses because their distributions of permulation P-values differed the most from that of the corresponding categorical post hoc test (supplementary fig. S4b, Supplementary Material online)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The extension to RERconverge infers the ancestral evolutionary history of categorical traits.

    “The extension to RERconverge presented here provides three updates enabling the use of the software for analyses of categorical traits: (i) it infers the ancestral evolutionary history of categorical traits”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Maximum likelihood ancestral trait reconstruction using a continuous time Markov model of evolution was implemented for categorical traits.

    “we implemented maximum likelihood ancestral trait reconstruction using a continuous time Markov model of evolution; a framework that has been commonly applied to categorical traits (Pagel 1994; Pupko et al. 2000; Paradis et al. 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pagel 1994 source
    • cites Pupko et al. 2000 source
    • cites Paradis et al. 2004 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 32
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 33
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    RERconverge is an R package for the genome-wide association of convergent evolutionary rate shifts with convergent phenotypes.

    “we introduce categorical methods within RERconverge, an R package for the genome-wide association of convergent evolutionary rate shifts with convergent phenotypes (Kowalczyk et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kowalczyk et al. 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    RERconverge has been used to discover both coding and noncoding elements related to the evolution of continuous and binary traits including mammalian lifespan, hairlessness, and marine habitation.

    “RERconverge has been used with great success to discover both coding and noncoding elements related to the evolution of continuous and binary traits including mammalian lifespan, hairlessness, and marine habitation (Chikina et al. 2016; Kowalczyk et al. 2020, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chikina et al. 2016 source

      The Results describe using relative evolutionary rates of protein-coding genes to identify genes associated with marine mammal lineages. The Discussion calls this a gene-centric strategy and describes studying cis-regulatory regions as a potential extension, not something this study did. This paper therefore supports the marine-habitation, coding-gene example, but not the sentence’s noncoding, lifespan, or hairlessness examples. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Kowalczyk et al. 2020, 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The ancestral inference included 4 direct transitions between carnivore and herbivore, 12 direct transitions between carnivore and omnivore, and 19 direct transitions between herbivore and omnivore.

    “Specifically, this inference included 4 direct transitions between carnivore and herbivore, 12 direct transitions between carnivore and omnivore, and 19 direct transitions between herbivore and omnivore”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Two genes were selected that each had a significant rate shift in one binary comparison but did not show a significant rate shift according to the corresponding categorical post hoc test.

    “We then selected two genes that each had a significant (large effect) rate shift in one of these binary comparisons but did not show a significant rate shift according to the corresponding categorical post hoc test.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingcitation

    Categorical RERconverge uses maximum likelihood with a continuous time Markov model (CTMM) to infer ancestral states.

    “we chose for categorical RERconverge to use maximum likelihood with a continuous time Markov model (CTMM) to infer ancestral states”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Time per phenotype set increased exponentially as the number of categories increased, ranging from 7.2 s for two categories to 4,933 s for six categories.

    “Time (seconds) per phenotype set increased exponentially (y = x8.11 − 223.66, R2 = 0.567) as the number of categories increased, ranging from 7.2 s for two categories to 4,933 s for six categories”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    phylANOVA detects 142 genes with P < 0.05, whereas categorical RERconverge detects 1086 genes with P < 0.05 with the omnibus test.

    “phylANOVA detects 142 genes with P < 0.05, whereas categorical RERconverge detects 1086 genes with P < 0.05 with the omnibus test.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    To a lesser extent, the same trend of slower evolution in carnivores is observed for carnivores compared to omnivores and omnivores compared to herbivores.

    “To a lesser extent, the same trend is observed for carnivores compared to omnivores (Fig. 6b, blue) and omnivores compared to herbivores (Fig. 6b, pink).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    8 of the 44 herbivore lineages and 5 of the 23 omnivore lineages also possess a glycine at the PIEZO1 residue corresponding to human residue 1,835.

    “While 8 of the 44 herbivore lineages and 5 of the 23 omnivore lineages also possess a glycine”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Using 10% relaxation provides order of magnitude speed increases without significantly affecting results.

    “using 10% relaxation provides order of magnitude speed increases without significantly affecting results”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Categorical permulations corrected for nonuniform null distributions while phylogenetic simulations did not.

    “We verified that categorical permulations corrected for nonuniform null distributions while phylogenetic simulations did not”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The delta statistic and categorical RERconverge both show diet-related signal.

    “The delta statistic and categorical RERconverge both show diet-related signal”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Different genes contributed to the enrichment of the abnormal digestion pathway; ITGB1 and TREH were captured by the RERconverge omnibus test while SLC10A2 and PNLIP showed greater association in the delta statistic analysis.

    “different genes contributed to the enrichment; e.g. ITGB1 and TREH were captured by RERconverge omnibus test while SLC10A2 and PNLIP showed greater association in the delta statistic analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The abnormal digestion pathway showed significant enrichment of genes in the categorical omnibus test but not in the categorical post hoc or pairwise binary analyses.

    “We found significant enrichment of genes within this pathway in the categorical omnibus test but not in the categorical post hoc or pairwise binary analyses (Fig. 4c and d, supplementary fig. S5, Supplementary Material online; omnibus permulation P = 9 × 10−4 vs. all categorical post hoc permulation P ≥ 0.27, all pairwise binary permulation P ≥ 0.10).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Positive regulation of ERK1/2 cascade and MAPK cascade pathways were enriched among the categorical carnivore/herbivore post hoc test results.

    “both positive regulation of ERK1/2 cascade (permulation P = 0.0175) and MAPK cascade (permulation P = 0.0143) pathways were enriched among the categorical carnivore/herbivore post hoc test results”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The abnormal digestion pathway was significantly enriched according to both the delta statistic and categorical RERconverge.

    “the abnormal digestion pathway, which was significantly enriched according to both.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Enrichment is lower and P-values higher for digestive tract development among the carnivore/non-carnivore, herbivore/non-herbivore, carnivore/herbivore, and herbivore/carnivore binary pairwise analyses.

    “while enrichment is lower and P-values higher among the carnivore/non-carnivore, herbivore/non-herbivore, carnivore/herbivore, and herbivore/carnivore binary pairwise analyses”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingown data

    The number of species did not appear to have an effect on permulation time.

    “While the number of species did not appear to have an effect on permulation time”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In the two-category analysis, species number appeared strongly correlated with permulation time (R2 > 0.5), but the effect appeared minor (0.02 s per species).

    “In the two-category analysis, where species number appeared to be strongly correlated with permulation time (R2 > 0.5), the effect appeared to be minor (0.02 s per species)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Previous RERconverge ancestral trait reconstruction functionality was only available for binary or continuous traits and used an approximate maximum parsimony approach for binary traits and estimation of maximum likelihood states for continuous traits.

    “Previous RERconverge ancestral trait reconstruction functionality was only available for binary or continuous traits and used an approximate maximum parsimony approach for binary traits and estimation of maximum likelihood states for continuous traits (Maddison 1989; Kowalczyk et al. 2019; Revell 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Maddison 1989 source
    • cites Kowalczyk et al. 2019 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites Revell 2024 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Simulations have the advantage of generating values with respect to the phylogeny, but they have the limitation that simulated values may have a very different distribution from that of original values.

    “Simulations have the advantage of generating values with respect to the phylogeny, but they have the limitation that simulated values may have a very different distribution from that of original values.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    phylANOVA uses an ANOVA test to compare means of a continuous phenotype for extant species across categories and computes P-values empirically from simulations to account for phylogenetic relationships.

    “phylANOVA”, uses an ANOVA test to compare means of a continuous phenotype for extant species across categories and computes P-values empirically from simulations to account for phylogenetic relationships between species (Garland et al. 1993).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Garland et al. 1993 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    PhylANOVA only includes extant species and therefore does not assign ancestral states.

    “PhylANOVA only includes extant species and therefore does not assign ancestral states”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The diet phenotype was annotated using prior literature for those species.

    “The diet phenotype was annotated using prior literature for those species (Nowak 1999)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nowak 1999 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    RERconverge quantifies the rate of substitution along a branch as an evolutionary rate and computes relative evolutionary rates (RERs) that reflect whether a given gene is evolving slower or faster than expected along a branch of the phylogeny.

    “The rate of substitution along a branch is quantified as an evolutionary rate and, by correcting for factors affecting rates at all genes or on all branches of a phylogeny, we can compute relative evolutionary rates (RERs) that reflect whether a given gene is evolving slower or faster than expected along a branch of the phylogeny (Kowalczyk et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kowalczyk et al. 2019 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The delta statistic has been successfully applied to find genes associated with the evolution of mammalian sleep patterns.

    “This statistic has been successfully applied to find genes associated with the evolution of mammalian sleep patterns (Borges et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Borges et al. 2019 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    RERconverge provides a built-in method, known as permulations, for the correction of P-values for phylogenetic dependence and other sources of systematic variation leading to nonindependence in the data.

    “The package also provides a built-in method, known as permulations, for the correction of P-values for phylogenetic dependence and other sources of systematic variation leading to nonindependence in the data (Saputra et al. 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Saputra et al. 2021 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    To calculate meaningful P-values, it is helpful to construct an empirical null distribution by generating many null instances and calculating the P-value as the proportion of null instances that have a more extreme statistic than observed using real data.

    “Therefore, to calculate meaningful P-values, it is helpful to construct an empirical null distribution by generating many null instances and calculating the P-value as the proportion of the null instances that have a more extreme statistic than observed using real data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    The delta statistic uses permutations of the phenotype to generate null instances.

    “The delta statistic uses permutations of the phenotype to generate null instances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The independent evolution of omnivores and herbivores suggests the presence of real phenotypic convergence that could be used to identify diet-associated convergent molecular evolution.

    “suggesting the presence of real phenotypic convergence that could be used to identify diet-associated convergent molecular evolution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    By default, binary RERconverge uses an approximate maximum parsimony approach to infer ancestral states.

    “By default, binary RERconverge uses an approximate maximum parsimony approach to infer ancestral states”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The delta statistic calculates phylogenetic signal for categorical traits.

    “Ribeiro and Borges presented the delta statistic for calculating phylogenetic signal for categorical traits (Borges et al. 2019; Ribeiro et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Borges et al. 2019 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites Ribeiro et al. 2023 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    PhylANOVA uses a simulation approach to create null values, which creates new values based on inferred evolution along the phylogeny.

    “PhylANOVA uses a simulation approach to create null values (in our case, null terminal branch RERs), a procedure that creates new values based on inferred evolution along the phylogeny.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Carnivores have been shown to have shortened digestive tracts relative to non-carnivores.

    “Carnivores have been shown to have shortened digestive tracts relative to non-carnivores (Stevens and Hume 1995)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stevens and Hume 1995

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    Each transition is interpreted as a potential independent convergent event.

    “where each transition is interpreted as a potential independent convergent event”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Binary permulations maintain the same number of foreground species and the same structural relationships between foreground species.

    “For instance, binary permulations maintain the same number of foreground species and the same structural relationships between foreground species (Saputra et al. 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Saputra et al. 2021 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The ensuing influx of cations, especially Ca2+, is involved in many downstream processes including activation of integrin, ERK1/2-MAPK, and other signaling pathways involved in cell differentiation during digestive system development.

    “The ensuing influx of cations, especially Ca2+, is involved in many downstream processes including activation of integrin, ERK1/2-MAPK, and other signaling pathways involved in cell differentiation during digestive system development (He et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites He et al. 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Overall the delta statistic and categorical RERconverge are identifying different, though potentially complementary, top genes associated with the diet phenotype.

    “indicating that overall the two methods are identifying different, though potentially complementary, top genes associated with this diet phenotype.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisereasoning

    Insectivores are a specialized carnivore when not distinguishing between vertebrates and invertebrates.

    “insectivores were considered carnivores since, not distinguishing between vertebrates and invertebrates, insectivores are a specialized carnivore.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A certain pattern in branch lengths may contribute to the observed phenotype structure.

    “Thus, a certain pattern in branch lengths may contribute to the observed phenotype structure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The categorical permulations algorithm employs three steps to ensure that the permulated phenotype contains the same number of species with each trait value as the original phenotype.

    “The categorical permulations algorithm employs three steps to ensure that the permulated phenotype contains the same number of species with each trait value as the original phenotype”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Reconstruction certainty depends on inferred phylogeny branch lengths, which are related to evolutionary rates.

    “Reconstruction certainty, among many factors, depends on inferred phylogeny branch lengths which are related to evolutionary rates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pagel 1994 source
    • cites Pupko et al. 2000 source
    • cites Paradis et al. 2004 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The human PIEZO1 residue corresponding to residue 1,835 is the site of a known, likely benign, missense variant within human populations that changes alanine to valine.

    “It is also the site of a known, likely benign, missense variant within human populations that changes alanine to valine (Sherry et al. 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sherry et al. 1999 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The enrichment signal of a pathway may be driven by a single pairwise comparison or by multiple pairwise comparisons.

    “the enrichment signal of a pathway may be driven by a single pairwise comparison or by multiple pairwise comparisons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The PIEZO1 gene (omnibus test permulations P = 0.029) of the peripheral nervous system has been extensively studied in the context of diet.

    “For example, the PIEZO1 gene (omnibus test permulations P = 0.029) of the peripheral nervous system has been extensively studied in the context of diet (He et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites He et al. 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Genes within the same pathway with evolutionary rate shifts in opposite directions do not both contribute to the same enrichment signal and may cancel out each other's effect.

    “As a result, genes within the same pathway with evolutionary rate shifts in opposite directions with regard to the phenotype do not both contribute to the same enrichment signal and may even “cancel out” each other's effect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    PIEZO1 is a mechanosensitive ion channel which opens in response to mechanical forces.

    “PIEZO1 is a mechanosensitive ion channel which opens in response to mechanical forces.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites He et al. 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The starch and sucrose metabolism pathway has a clear relationship to the diet phenotype.

    “which has a clear relationship to the diet phenotype”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Subramanian et al. 2005 source
    • cites Liberzon et al. 2011 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Many ancestral likelihood inference methods model the probability of phenotype change as a function of branch length.

    “many ancestral likelihood inference methods model the probability of phenotype change as a function of branch length (Pagel 1994; Pupko et al. 2000; Paradis et al. 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pagel 1994 source
    • cites Pupko et al. 2000 source
    • cites Paradis et al. 2004 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The implementation within the RERconverge workflow is crucial to developing a method that allows users to compare relative evolutionary rates across more than two phenotypic categories simultaneously.

    “our implementation within the RERconverge workflow is crucial to developing a method that allows users to compare relative evolutionary rates across more than two phenotypic categories simultaneously”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Disruptions of PIEZO1 function in human and mouse models lead to differences in digestion and iron metabolism, both related to the evolution diet phenotypes.

    “Disruptions of PIEZO1 function in human and mouse models lead to differences in digestion and iron metabolism, both related to the evolution diet phenotypes (Ma et al. 2021; Amado et al. 2024)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ma et al. 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Amado et al. 2024 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The delta statistic's bias toward slower evolution of carnivore lineages may be a consequence of the delta statistic using certainty in ancestral state inference to identify phylogenetic signal.

    “This trend may be the consequence of the delta statistic using certainty in ancestral state inference to identify phylogenetic signal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Differences between the delta statistic and categorical RERconverge may stem from methodological differences, including that the delta statistic detects a different type of evolutionary signal, but may also be driven by potential bias in genes captured by the delta statistic.

    “These differences may stem from methodological differences—the delta statistic detects a different type of evolutionary signal from RERconverge—but they may also be driven by potential bias in genes captured by the delta statistic”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    In human PIEZO1, the residue corresponding to residue 1,835 falls within a disordered region between two transmembrane domains.

    “In human PIEZO1, this residue falls within a disordered region between two transmembrane domains (Surhone et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Surhone et al. 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Phylogenetic ANOVA only considers phenotypes for extant species, whereas RERconverge includes all branches within the phylogeny of the sampled species, leading to different sample sizes and hence different power for the same species set.

    “phylogenetic ANOVA only considers phenotypes for extant species, whereas RERconverge includes all branches within the phylogeny of the sampled species, leading to different sample sizes (and hence different power) for the same species set.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Piscivores and anthropivores are subsets of carnivores and omnivores, respectively.

    “Piscivores and anthropivores are subsets of carnivores and omnivores, respectively”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    The extension includes updated methodology for ancestral trait reconstruction, statistics applicable to categorical variables, and adaptation of permulations to correct for uneven phylogenetic distribution of categorical traits.

    “Our extension includes updated methodology for ancestral trait reconstruction, statistics that can be applied to categorical variables, and the adaptation of permulations to correct for the effects of uneven phylogenetic distribution of categorical traits”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
57 of 57
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The three mammalian diet categories (herbivore, omnivore, carnivore) cannot be meaningfully ordered.

    “the mammalian diet type phenotype has three main categories (herbivore, omnivore, and carnivore) that cannot be meaningfully ordered.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The strict assumptions of the ANOVA test are often violated by genomic data like evolutionary rates.

    “phylANOVA is limited by the strict assumptions of the ANOVA test, which are often violated by genomic data like evolutionary rates.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a lack of available comparative tools to study categorical traits.

    “another method, the delta statistic, that also seeks to address the lack of available comparative tools to study categorical traits.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The delta statistic lacks post hoc testing to evaluate which comparisons contribute to the omnibus signal.

    “That limitation is compounded by a lack of post hoc testing available through the delta statistic to evaluate which comparisons contribute to the omnibus signal.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expanding the phylogenetic breadth of a study may reveal additional biological variation, such as more phenotypic categories or intermediate phenotypes between presence and absence.

    “For example, expanding the phylogenetic breadth of a study may reveal additional biological variation, such as more phenotypic categories or intermediate phenotypes between “presence” and “absence” (Redlich et al. 2024).”
  • The δ statistic and RERconverge generally identify distinct sets of genetic elements for nonbinary categorical traits.

    “Redlich et al. (2024) found that the δ statistic and RERconverge generally identified distinct sets of genetic elements, suggesting that further research into the impacts of these two approaches to modeling changes in evolutionary rate may be required.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. King, 2018, Statistical reasoning in the behavioral sciences
  2. Ogle, 2023, FSA: simple fisheries stock assessment methods. R package version 0.9. 4

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Redlich, R., Kowalczyk, A., Tene, M., Sestili, H. H., Foley, K., Saputra, E., Clark, N., Chikina, M., Meyer, W. K., & Pfenning, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Lehigh University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
  • Redlich, Ruby
  • Foley, Kathleen
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2024-10-15
Volume
41
Issue
11
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W4403431299
Cited by
14
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Pittsburgh Center for Research Computing (RRID:SCR_022735)
  • NIH (S10OD028483)
  • Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship
  • Carnegie Mellon Neuroscience Institute Postdoctoral Fellowship (NSF 2046550, 2R01 HG009299-06A1, NSF 2238125, NSF 20-525)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
convergent evolution, ancestral state reconstruction, comparative genomics, pathway enrichment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review