Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Calculation of polychotomous logistic regression parameters using individualized regressions

BECG, COLIN B., GRAY, ROBERT·1984·Biometrika

Abstract

The use of individualized logistic regression, in which a series of separate simple logistic regression analyses are performed as a replacement for polychotomous logistic regression, is studied. The asymptotic relative efficiencies of the individual parameter estimates are observed to be generally high, as are the efficiencies of predicted probability estimates and, to a somewhat lesser extent, joint tests of parameters from different regressions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biomet/71.1.11

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 298

Metadata

Authors
BECG, C. B., & GRAY, R.
Venue
Biometrika
Published
1984
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
11-18
ISSN
  • 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3510
OpenAlex
W2085641264
Cited by
298
References
0
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calculation of polychotomous logistic regression parameters using individualized regressions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biomet/71.1.11
The paper
BECG, C. B., & GRAY, R. (1984). Calculation of polychotomous logistic regression parameters using individualized regressions. Biometrika. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/71.1.11

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.