The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The prognostic analogue of the propensity score
Abstract
The propensity score collapses the covariates of an observational study into a single measure summarizing their joint association with treatment conditions; prognostic scores summarize covariates' association with potential responses. As with propensity scores, stratification on prognostic scores brings to uncontrolled studies a concrete and desirable form of balance, a balance that is more familiar as an objective of experimental control. Like propensity scores, prognostic scores can reduce the dimension of the covariate, yet causal inferences conditional on them are as valid as are inferences conditional only on the unreduced covariate. As a method of adjustment unto itself, prognostic scoring has limitations not shared with propensity scoring, but it holds promise as a complement to the propensity score, particularly in certain designs for which unassisted propensity adjustment is difficult or infeasible. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator
Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00044 · Cited by 3,807
Zhao, Z. (2004) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465304323023705 · Cited by 389
Accounting for the Black–White Wealth Gap: A Nonparametric Approach
Barsky, R., Bound, J., Charles, K. K., & Lupton, J. P. (2002) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214502388618401 · Cited by 374
Cited by
Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward
Stuart, E. A. (2010) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/09-sts313 · Cited by 5,478
Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching
Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr013 · Cited by 3,563
A combined comorbidity score predicted mortality in elderly patients better than existing scores
Gagne, J. J., Glynn, R. J., Avorn, J., Levin, R., & Schneeweiss, S. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.10.004 · Cited by 995
The Use of Propensity Scores to Assess the Generalizability of Results from Randomized Trials
Stuart, E. A., Cole, S. R., Bradshaw, C. P., & Leaf, P. J. (2011) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2010.00673.x · Cited by 524
Yao, L., Chu, Z., Li, S., Li, Y., Gao, J., & Zhang, A. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3444944 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen, B. B.
- Venue
- Biometrika
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-02-04
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 481-488
- ISSN
- 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3510
- OpenAlex
- W2006290997
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prognostic analogue of the propensity score. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biomet/asn004
- The paper
- Hansen, B. B. (2008). The prognostic analogue of the propensity score. Biometrika. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asn004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.