Cited by 35Wildlife Ecology and ConservationResearch Data Management PracticesConservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education

A Novel Framework to Protect Animal Data in a World of Ecosurveillance

Open access
Lennox, Robert J, Harcourt, Robert, Bennett, Joseph R, Davies, Alasdair, Ford, Adam T, Frey, Remo M, Hayward, Matt W, Hussey, Nigel E +12 more·2020·BioScience

Abstract

Surveillance of animal movements using electronic tags (i.e., biotelemetry) has emerged as an essential tool for both basic and applied ecological research and monitoring. Advances in animal tracking are occurring simultaneously with changes to technology, in an evolving global scientific culture that increasingly promotes data sharing and transparency. However, there is a risk that misuse of biotelemetry data could increase the vulnerability of animals to human disturbance or exploitation. For the most part, telemetry data security is not a danger to animals or their ecosystems, but for some high-risk cases, as with species’ with high economic value or at-risk populations, available knowledge of their movements may promote active disturbance or worse, potential poaching. We suggest that when designing animal tracking studies it is incumbent on scientists to consider the vulnerability of their study animals to risks arising from the implementation of the proposed program, and to take preventative measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biosci/biaa035

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some cases, it is imperative that the privacy of the data be preserved, for instance to avoid giving poachers access to locations of animals in near-real-time.

    “In some cases, it is imperative that the privacy of the data be preserved, for instance to avoid giving poachers access to locations of animals in near-real-time134.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [134]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Taryn S. Murray is affiliated with the South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, in Grahamstown, South Africa. DGR is also affiliated with the Institute of Biology at the University of Neuchâtel, in Neuchâtel, Switzerland. Nathan Young is affiliated with the Department of Sociology and Anthropology at the University of Ottawa, in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/70/6/468/5822090 by guest on 03 June 2024

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lennox, R. J., Harcourt, R., Bennett, J. R., Davies, A., Ford, A. T., Frey, R. M., Hayward, M. W., Hussey, N. E., Iverson, S. J., Kays, R., Kessel, S. T., Mcmahon, C., Muelbert, M., Murray, T. S., Nguyen, V. M., Pye, J. D., Roche, D. G., Whoriskey, F. G., Young, N., & Cooke, S. J.
Affiliations
  • NORCE Research AS (NO)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • Carleton University (CA)
  • Zoological Society of London (GB)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • University of Windsor (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences (US)
  • Shedd Aquarium (US)
  • Instituto de Oceanografia, Rio Grande, Rio Grande de Sul, Brazil
  • South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (ZA)
  • University of Neuchâtel (CH)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Lennox, Robert J
Venue
BioScience
Published
2020-04-29
Volume
70
Issue
6
Pages
468-476
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
OpenAlex
W3023231788
Cited by
35
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BioScience (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Ocean Tracking Network
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (838237)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Keywords
animal tracking, biotelemetry, poaching, human disturbance, data sharing, threatened species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review