Cited by 109Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Cascading Consequences of the Loss of Large Mammals in an African Savanna

Keesing, Felicia, Young, Truman P.·2014·BioScience

Abstract

African savannas are home to an abundant and diverse assemblage of wild herbivores, but the very grasses that sustain these wild herds also make savannas attractive to humans and their livestock. We used the Kenya Long-term Exclosure Experiment to investigate the ecological effects of different combinations of native and domestic grazers. The experimental removal of large grazing mammals set into motion a cascade of consequences, beginning with the doubling in abundance of a small grazing mammal, the pouched mouse (Saccostomus mearnsi). The presence of abundant mice attracted venomous snakes such as the olive hissing snake (Psammophis mossambicus); devastated seedlings of the dominant tree (Acacia drepanolobium); and doubled the abundance of fleas, which potentially increased the risk of transmission of flea-borne pathogens. Together, these results show the potential for the loss of large mammals to have cryptic consequences for African savannas, with important and often undesirable repercussions for humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biosci/biu059

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When biodiversity is lost from ecological communities, the species most likely to disappear are large-bodied species with slower life histories, while smaller-bodied species with fast life histories tend to increase in abundance.

    “When biodiversity is lost from ecological communities, the species most likely to disappear are large-bodied species with slower life histories (e.g., ref. 65), while smaller-bodied species with fast life histories tend to increase in abundance (e.g., ref. 66).”

    From Impacts of biodiversity and biodiversity loss on zoonotic diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [66]

    The cited paper supports the ref. 66 portion: in “Effects of large mammals on small mammals” (page unavailable), it reports that pouched mice became twice as abundant on average where large mammals were excluded and suggests higher reproductive rates. It does not establish that fast-life-history species generally increase across ecological communities experiencing biodiversity loss. The large-bodied, slow-life-history portion is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The effects of defaunation will be less about the loss of absolute diversity than about local shifts in species composition and functional groups within a community.

    “the effects of defaunation will be much less about the loss of absolute diversity than about local shifts in species compositions and functional groups within a community (80).”

    From Defaunation in the Anthropocene (2014) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Conclusions (page not available) describe the replacement of large herbivores by smaller mammals and arthropods, and the ‘Effects of large mammals on small mammals’ section reports changes in vegetation and consumer abundance. These support local shifts in the community, but the paper does not establish that such shifts matter more than losses of absolute diversity or make a general comparison of the two effects of defaunation. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Keesing F. 1997. Ecological Interactions between Small Mammals, Large Mammals, and Vegetation in a Tropical Savanna of Central Kenya. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  2. Young TP, Okello B, Kinyua D, Palmer TM. 1998. KLEE: The Kenya Long- term Exclosure Experiment. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 14: 94-102.
  3. Truman P. Young is affiliated with the Department of Plant Sciences at the University of California, Davis. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/64/6/487/289974 by guest on 19 August 2023

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keesing, F., & Young, T. P.
Affiliations
Bard College (US)
Venue
BioScience
Published
2014-05-06
Volume
64
Issue
6
Pages
487-495
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
OpenAlex
W2160941732
Cited by
109
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
11.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BioScience (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (97-07477, 0196177, 0316402, 0816453)
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • National Geographic Society (9106‐12, 4691-91)
  • Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation
  • Bard College
  • American Society of Mammalogists
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (98210‐0‐G563)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
grazing exclusion, Acacia drepanolobium, seedling mortality, flea-borne pathogens, domestic livestock, African savanna

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review