Cited by 331Big Data Technologies and ApplicationsResearch Data Management PracticesEnvironmental Monitoring and Data Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 139 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Situating Ecology as a Big-Data Science: Current Advances, Challenges, and Solutions

Abstract

Ecology has joined a world of big data. Two complementary frameworks define big data: data that exceed the analytical capacities of individuals or disciplines or the “Four Vs” axes of volume, variety, veracity, and velocity. Variety predominates in ecoinformatics and limits the scalability of ecological science. Volume varies widely. Ecological velocity is low but growing as data throughput and societal needs increase. Ecological big-data systems include in situ and remote sensors, community data resources, biodiversity databases, citizen science, and permanent stations. Technological solutions include the development of open code- and data-sharing platforms, flexible statistical models that can handle heterogeneous data and sources of uncertainty, and cloud-computing delivery of high-velocity computing to large-volume analytics. Cultural solutions include training targeted to early and current scientific workforce and strengthening collaborations among ecologists and data scientists. The broader goal is to maximize the power, scalability, and timeliness of ecological insights and forecasting.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biosci/biy068

Cites

139 of 139 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 143 references

4 of the 143 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Arkin, 2016, The DOE Systems Biology Knowledgebase (KBase), bioRxiv
  2. Armbrust, 2009, Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
  3. Berners-Lee, 2006, Linked data
  4. Felton, 2017, Plant ecological responses to climate extremes from the individual to the ecosystem level, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 372
  5. Hassan, 2011, Demystifying cloud computing, Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 1, 16
  6. Huang, 2012, Adaptive Nested Models and Cloud Computing for Scientific Simulation: A Case Study Using Dust Storm Forecasting
  7. Lehnert, 2015, The new paradigm of data publication, Elements, 11, 368
  8. Norouzzadeh, 2017, Automatically identifying wild animals in camera trap images with deep learning. arXiv, Cornell University Library
  9. Skytland, 2012, What is NASA doing with big data today?
  10. Smith, 2016, Towards real-time measurement of public epidemic awareness: Monitoring influenza awareness through Twitter. Paper presented at the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) Spring Symposium on Observational Studies through Social Media and Other Human-Generated Content
  11. [USGS] US Geological Service, 2017, National Water Information System Data Available on the World Wide Web (USGS Water Data for the Nation)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 330

Metadata

Authors
Farley, S. S., Dawson, A., Goring, S. J., & Williams, J. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Mount Royal University (CA)
Venue
BioScience
Published
2018-07-18
Volume
68
Issue
8
Pages
563-576
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
OpenAlex
W2883471235
Cited by
331
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2
FWCI
26.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BioScience (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
Keywords
ecoinformatics, data scalability, remote sensing, citizen science, biodiversity databases, open data sharing, cloud computing, uncertainty quantification, ecological forecasting, data science education, interdisciplinary collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review