Effect of transdermal hyoscine on nausea and vomiting after surgical correction of prominent ears under general anaesthesia
Open accessAbstract
In a double-blind, randomized study, we have compared the efficacy of transdermal hyoscine with placebo in the reduction of nausea and vomiting in 50 patients, ASA I-II, after surgical correction of prominent ears under general anaesthesia. In the placebo group, 28%, 4% and 48% of patients suffered nausea, retching and vomiting, respectively, during the first 24 h after anaesthesia. The corresponding values in the hyoscine group were 12%, 0% and 16% (P < 0.01). In the placebo group more patients (48%) needed droperidol as an antiemetic compared with the hyoscine group (16%; P < 0.05). There was significantly more sedation in the hyoscine group.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A 0.5-mg transdermal hyoscine patch reduced vomiting from 48% to 16% versus placebo.
“Honkavaara et al18 reported that a 0.5-mg transdermal hyoscine patch reduced vomiting from 48% to 16% versus placebo, but produced short-lived blurred vision, dizziness, and bradycardia in less than 10% of children, almost all resolving within 2 hours, except for 1 case.”
From Perioperative Analgesia and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Management in Otoplasty: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
Transdermal hyoscine patches and maintenance anesthesia with propofol each reduced vomiting rates by about one-half relative to placebo or thiopentone/isoflurane, respectively.
“Transdermal hyoscine patches18 and maintenance anesthesia with propofol19 each reduced vomiting rates by about one-half relative to placebo or thiopentone/isoflurane, respectively.”
From Perioperative Analgesia and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Management in Otoplasty: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
The hyoscine patch produced short-lived blurred vision, dizziness, and bradycardia in less than 10% of children, almost all resolving within 2 hours, except for 1 case.
“Honkavaara et al18 reported that a 0.5-mg transdermal hyoscine patch reduced vomiting from 48% to 16% versus placebo, but produced short-lived blurred vision, dizziness, and bradycardia in less than 10% of children, almost all resolving within 2 hours, except for 1 case.”
From Perioperative Analgesia and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Management in Otoplasty: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
Cervical plexus blocks occasionally produced mild hoarseness or self-limiting Horner syndrome-like symptoms.
“Cervical plexus blocks occasionally produced mild hoarseness or self-limiting Horner syndrome–like symptoms,1 and hyoscine patches were associated with brief visual disturbance or bradycardia in a small number of children.18”
From Perioperative Analgesia and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Management in Otoplasty: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
No permanent complications were reported.
“however, no permanent complications were reported.1,18”
From Perioperative Analgesia and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Management in Otoplasty: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
The favorable safety signal for transdermal hyoscine derives from just 1 pediatric RCT.
“Finally, the single lidocaine-versus-bupivacaine trial is subject to “duration bias,” as distinct Na⁺-channel binding kinetics confound any anatomical effect, and the favorable safety signal for transdermal hyoscine derives from just 1 pediatric RCT.”
From Perioperative Analgesia and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Management in Otoplasty: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
Hyoscine patches produced reversible anticholinergic effects (blurred vision, dry mouth, dizziness) in a minority of children.
“Conversely, hyoscine patches, though effective, produced reversible anticholinergic effects (blurred vision, dry mouth, dizziness) in a minority of children.18”
From Perioperative Analgesia and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Management in Otoplasty: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alnufaei, A. H., AlSubaie, F. K., Aljabri, R. A., Aloqayli, S. Z., Alanshmi, S., Alotaibi, S. M., Ajeeb, Z. B., AlGhamdi, L. Y., Kattan, M. E., Alahmadi, B. H., et al. (2026) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000007347
“Transdermal hyoscine patches 18 and maintenance anesthesia with propofol 19 each reduced vomiting rates by about one-half relative to placebo or thiopentone/ isoflurane, respectively.”
Influential
- Authors
- HONKAVAARA, P., SAARNIVAARA, L., & KLEMOLA, U.-M.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Venue
- British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 647-650
- ISSN
- 0007-0912 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131118318
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- British Journal of Anaesthesia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Keywords
- postoperative nausea and vomiting, otoplasty, general anesthesia, antiemetic prophylaxis, droperidol, sedation
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Cutaneous, Adolescent, Adult, Anesthesia, General, Child, Double-Blind Method, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Male, Nausea, Postoperative Complications, Scopolamine, Time Factors, Vomiting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review