Cited by 235Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPain Management and Placebo Effect

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Role of psychology in pain management

Open access
Eccleston, C.·2001·British Journal of Anaesthesia

Abstract

Psychological factors are central to the experience of pain, the delivery of effective analgesia and for the specific treatment of chronic pain and disability. Improvement in pain management can often be brought about by very simple, if subtle, changes in clinical practice. Although simple, these changes can have significant effects in the experience of pain, distress and use of health-care resources. For the chronic pain patient, the presentation is much more complex and the treatment interdisciplinary and programmatic. The evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy for adults with chronic pain is now well established. This treatment should be available as a core part of any chronic pain service.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bja/87.1.144

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 73 references

4 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Davies, 1992, Pain clinic patients in Northern Britain, Pain Clin, 5, 129
  2. Richardson, 1994, Placebo effects in pain management, Pain Rev, 1, 15

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–235 of 235

Metadata

Authors
Eccleston, C.
Affiliations
University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Eccleston, C.
Venue
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-07
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
144-152
ISSN
0007-0912 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119351869
Cited by
235
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
chronic pain, pain management, psychological factors in pain, psychosocial environment, pain beliefs, pain-related disability, pain catastrophizing, pain-related hopelessness, pain-related helplessness, pain-related guilt, pain-related shame, pain-related depression, pain-related anxiety
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Humans, Pain, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Evidence-Based Medicine, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review