Refined Falsificationism Meets the Challenge from the Relativist Philosophy of Science
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lakatos does not actually break with falsificationism.
“It is important to note, however, that Lakatos does not actually break with falsificationism.”
From Falsification and consciousness (2021) · cites this paper as Radnitzky 1991
Cites
<i>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</i>
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538 · see citing works
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
Bhaskar, R. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203090732-9 · Cited by 7,765 · see citing works
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.
Kendall, M. G., & Popper, K. R. (1959) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2332835 · Cited by 2,896 · see citing works
Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact.
Pickering, A., Fleck, L., Trenn, T. J., Merton, R. Κ., & Bradley, F. (1982) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2067139 · Cited by 1,750 · see citing works
E.N., & Popper, K. (1935) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2016612 · Cited by 1,429 · see citing works
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Ardley, G. (1964) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.5840/philstudies196413082 · Cited by 783 · see citing works
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge
Ardley, G. (1971) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.5840/philstudies197120081 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
Bartley, W. W. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Centripetal forces in the sciences
Radnitzky, G. A. (1987) · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationThe ‘Economic’ Approach to the Philosophy of Science
Radnitzky, G. A. (1987) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/38.2.159 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationPhilosophy and the Mirror of Rorty
Münz, P. (1984) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/004839318401400206 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paradigmatic Faults in International-Relations Theory
Jackson, P. T., & Nexon, D. H. (2009) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00562.x · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Falsification and consciousness
Kleiner, J., & Hoel, E. (2021) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niab001 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“This is why Lakatos description of science is often called “refined falsificationism” in philosophy of science (Radnitzky 1991).”
BackgroundFalsification and consciousness
Kleiner, J., & Hoel, E. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.03541 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- RADNITZKY, G.
- Affiliations
- Universität Trier (DE)
- Corresponding author
- RADNITZKY, GERARD
- Venue
- The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1991-06-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 273-284
- ISSN
- 0007-0882 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3537
- OpenAlex
- W2058812263
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- falsificationism, scientific realism, relativism, philosophy of science, scientific method
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
