Cited by 32Cancer survivorship and careEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Psychological distress and health-related quality of life up to 2 years after oesophageal cancer surgery: nationwide population-based study

Open access
Liu, Y J, Schandl, A, Markar, S, Johar, A, Lagergren, P·2021·BJS Open

Abstract

Background: Patients are at higher risk of suffering from psychological distress and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after oesophageal cancer surgery. This Swedish nationwide population-based longitudinal study aimed to evaluate the association between psychological distress and HRQoL up to 2 years after oesophageal cancer surgery. Methods: The study included patients with oesophageal cancer who had survived for 1 year after oesophageal cancer surgery. The exposure was psychological distress measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Patients scoring at least 8 on either the anxiety or the depression subscale were classified as having psychological distress. The outcome was HRQoL assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire generic and disease-specific questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25). Exposure and outcome were measured at 1, 1.5, and 2 years after operation. Fixed-effects models with adjustment for all time-invariant confounding and potential time-varying confounders were used to examine the mean score difference in HRQoL between patients with and without psychological distress. Results: In total, 180 patients were analysed. Clinically relevant, statistically significant and time-constant mean score differences were found in emotional function, social function, dyspnoea, anxiety, eating difficulty, eating in front of others, and weight loss (mean score difference range 10–29). Mean score differences for global quality of life, cognitive function, appetite loss, EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score, and trouble with taste increased over time, and reached clinical and statistical significance at 1.5 and/or 2 years after surgery. For body image, there was a clinically relevant decrease in mean score difference over time. Conclusion: Psychological distress was associated with several aspects of poor HRQoL up to 2 years after surgery for oesophageal cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa038

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The social aspect included only two subthemes, probably because untreated patients have not yet suffered from image disorders and social distress associated with esophageal cancer (e.g., indwelling nutrition tubes and hoarseness).

    “Te social aspect included only two subthemes, probably because untreated patients have not yet sufered from the image disorders and social distress associated with esophageal cancer (e.g., indwelling nutrition tubes and hoarseness) [49].”

    From Symptom Experiences before Medical Help-Seeking and Psychosocial Responses of Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Qualitative Study. (2023) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Results (page unavailable) link psychological distress after oesophageal cancer surgery with worse social function and body-image concerns. The paper does not examine untreated patients or explain why a social aspect would have only two subthemes; the cited passages also do not link those concerns to indwelling nutrition tubes or hoarseness. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y. J., Schandl, A., Markar, S., Johar, A., & Lagergren, P.
Affiliations
Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Lagergren, P
Venue
BJS Open
Published
2021-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
ISSN
2474-9842 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3130965616
Cited by
32
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJS Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Swedish Cancer Society
  • Stockholm County Council
  • Cancer Research Funds of Radiumhemmet
  • Swedish Research Council
  • Karolinska Institute and China Scholarship Council joint programme
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Keywords
esophageal cancer, esophagectomy, psychological distress, health-related quality of life, postoperative anxiety, postoperative depression, dyspnea, eating difficulties, body image, long-term outcomes
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Esophageal Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review