Cited by 29Cancer survivorship and careEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Relationship between psychological distress and health-related quality of life at each point of the treatment of esophageal cancer

Ohkura, Yu, Ichikura, Kanako, Shindoh, Junichi, Ueno, Masaki, Udagawa, Harushi, Matsushima, Eisuke·2020·Esophagus

Abstract

Background Patients with esophageal cancer often feel depression or fear of death influenced by multiple clinical factors. This study sought to investigate the clinical factors associated with psychological distress, focusing on the influence of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for better psychological management of patients with esophageal cancer.Methods In total, 102 of 152 consecutive patients surgically treated at Toranomon Hospital met the eligibility criteria for analysis. Questionnaires designed to identify psychological distress and QOL (EORTC QLQ C-30/OES18) were administered at five time points during the treatment course. Degree of psychological distress was assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).Results Patients with HADS score ≥ 11 at each visit showed significantly higher level of symptoms or problems measured by the score of EORTC QLQ C-30/OES18 compared with those with HADS score ≤ 10. Emotional status was a significant factor associated with psychological distress at all times. Although functional scales including global health status or QOL status and symptom scales associated with esophageal cancer were strongly associated with psychological distress before treatment, scales associated with changes in habitus after esophagectomy showed significant correlation with psychological distress after surgery. No significant correlation was observed between psychological distress and individual baseline characteristics, apart from history of surgery and pathological staging.Conclusions Psychological distress during treatment course of esophageal cancer is significantly associated with HRQOL influenced by esophagectomy. The current results may warrant prospective intervention through enhanced recovery after surgery to better manage patients undergoing highly invasive procedures for esophageal cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10388-019-00710-y

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in psychological status of patients undergoing esophagectomy are significantly associated with changes in symptom experience and quality of life brought about by esophagectomy.

    “Ohkura et al. longitudinally tracked changes in the psychological status of patients undergoing esophagectomy at fve time points and showed that changes in patients' psychological status were signifcantly associated with changes in symptom experience and quality of life brought about by esophagectomy [47,48].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ohkura, Y., Ichikura, K., Shindoh, J., Ueno, M., Udagawa, H., & Matsushima, E.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP)
  • Toranomon Hospital (JP)
  • Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Research (JP)
Corresponding author
Ohkura, Yu
Venue
Esophagus
Published
2020-01-02
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
312-322
ISSN
  • 1612-9059 (ISSN-L)
  • 1612-9067
OpenAlex
W2998148818
Cited by
29
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Esophagus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Keywords
esophageal cancer, psychological distress, health-related quality of life, esophagectomy, depression, anxiety, emotional state, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, pathological staging, enhanced recovery after surgery, psychological management
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depression, Esophageal Neoplasms, Fear, Female, Health Status, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Esophagectomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review