Cited by 39Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Patient Involvement

An examination of the use of coercion by assertive outreach and community mental health teams in Northern Ireland

Davidson, G., Campbell, J.·2007·British Journal of Social Work

Abstract

In mental health services over recent decades, the positive move away from hospital-based care to community-based services has entailed that people with higher levels of need are being supported by community mental health services. This paper begins by reviewing the literature on coercion in the field of community-based mental health care and treatment. It is argued that the lack of a critical understanding of the concept and how it is used by practitioners and agencies can have serious repercussions for the rights of service users. Using a quasi-experimental, longitudinal design, the authors then seek to test some of the ideas about coercion by comparing the activities of assertive outreach and community mental health teams in Northern Ireland, particularly the key ideas of perceived coercion, workers’ strategies and engagement with services. Key findings were that assertive outreach appeared to be more successful at reducing perceived coercion, minimizing the need for coercive strategies, engaging high-risk clients and reducing inpatient bed use. These findings are compared with other studies in this area. The authors also argue that there is a need for greater transparency in the way that practitioners use coercive measures and more explicit guidance is required in this crucial area of mental health practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjsw/bcm017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidson, G., & Campbell, J.
Affiliations
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Davidson, G.
Venue
British Journal of Social Work
Published
2007-03-17
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
537-555
ISSN
  • 0045-3102 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-263X
OpenAlex
W2052893999
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The British Journal of Social Work (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
assertive outreach, community mental health teams, community mental health services, perceived coercion, service user rights, high-risk clients, Northern Ireland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review