Cited by 40Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDental Research and COVID-19Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic

Covid-19 and the ‘new normal’: are remote video consultations here to stay?

Open access
Bidmead, Elaine, Marshall, Alison·2020·British Medical Bulletin

Abstract

Introduction: During the UK Covid-19 lockdown, video consultations (telemedicine) were encouraged. The extent of usage, and to which concerns to earlier implementation were set aside, is unknown; this is worthy of exploration as data becomes available. Sources of data: Sources of data are as follows: published case studies, editorials, news articles and government guidance. Areas of agreement: Video can be clinically effective, especially where patients cannot attend due to illness or infection risk. Patients are positive, and they can benefit from savings in time and money. Adoption of telemedicine is hindered by a range of known barriers including clinician resistance due to technological problems, disrupted routines, increased workload, decreased work satisfaction and organizational readiness. Areas of controversy: Despite policy impetus and successful pilots, telemedicine has not been adopted at scale. Growing points: Increased use of telemedicine during the Covid-19 crisis presents opportunities to obtain robust evidence of issues and create service transformation effectively. Areas timely for developing research: Examination of telemedicine use during the Covid-19 crisis to ensure that the benefits and usage continue into the post-lockdown, ‘new normal’ world.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bmb/ldaa025

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. NHSX. COVID-19 information governance advice for staff working in health and care organisations. https://www.nhsx.nhs.uk/covid-19-response/data-a nd-information-governance/information-governance/ covid-19-information-governance-advice-health-and- care-professionals/. (7 May 2020, date last accessed). Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bmb/article/135/1/16/5895942 by guest on 05 August 2022

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bidmead, E., & Marshall, A.
Affiliations
University of Cumbria (GB)
Corresponding author
Bidmead, Elaine
Venue
British Medical Bulletin
Published
2020-08-22
Volume
135
Issue
1
Pages
16-22
ISSN
  • 0007-1420 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-8391
OpenAlex
W3080949386
Cited by
40
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Medical Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Insight (University of Cumbria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
Keywords
telemedicine, video consultation, COVID-19 lockdown, new normal, telehealth adoption, barriers to telehealth, clinician resistance, teleconsultation
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Attitude of Health Personnel, Communicable Disease Control, Delivery of Health Care, Forecasting, United Kingdom, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Coronavirus Infections, Disease Transmission, Infectious, Remote Consultation, Videoconferencing, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review