Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 456

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vascular ischaemia and reperfusion injury

Eltzschig, Holger K., Collard, Charles D.·2004·British Medical Bulletin

Abstract

Although restoration of blood flow to an ischaemic organ is essential to prevent irreversible tissue injury, reperfusion per se may result in a local and systemic inflammatory response that may augment tissue injury in excess of that produced by ischaemia alone. Cellular damage after reperfusion of previously viable ischaemic tissues is defined as ischaemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury. I-R injury is characterized by oxidant production, complement activation, leucocyte-endothelial cell adhesion, platelet-leucocyte aggregation, increased microvascular permeability and decreased endothelium-dependent relaxation. In its severest form, I-R injury can lead to multiorgan dysfunction or death. Although our understanding of the pathophysiology of I-R injury has advanced significantly in the last decade, such experimentally derived concepts have yet to be fully integrated into clinical practice. Treatment of I-R injury is also confounded by the fact that inhibition of I-R-associated inflammation might disrupt protective physiological responses or result in immunosuppression. Thus, while timely reperfusion of the ischaemic area at risk remains the cornerstone of clinical practice, therapeutic strategies such as ischaemic preconditioning, controlled reperfusion, and anti-oxidant, complement or neutrophil therapy may significantly prevent or limit I-R-induced injury in humans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bmb/ldh025

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 456

Metadata

Authors
Eltzschig, H. K., & Collard, C. D.
Venue
British Medical Bulletin
Published
2004-01-01
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
71-86
ISSN
  • 0007-1420 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-8391
OpenAlex
W2101396622
Cited by
456
References
5
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.