The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NEUROCHEMICAL ALTERATIONS IN HUNTINGTON'S CHOREA: A STUDY OF POST-MORTEM BRAIN TISSUE
Abstract
Dopamine, noradrenaline, glutamic acid decarboxylase and choline acetyltransferase were measured in various regions of brain obtained at autopsy from a large series of cases of Huntington's chorea, dying with advanced forms of the disease. Neurochemical values in the choreic cases were compared with those from control and schizophrenic cases. In brain tissue from choreic patients, highly significant increases in dopamine concentrations were found in the corpus striatum, nucleus accumbens and pars compacta of the substantia nigra. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the nigrostriatal dopamine system is spared and may exert a relatively unopposed action on striatal function. Noradrenaline concentrations were raised in the caudate nucleus, lateral pallidum and pars reticulata of the substantia nigra, indicating preservation of central noradrenergic pathways. Glutamic acid decarboxylase activity was reduced in all brain regions examined but, taking ante-mortem factors into account, the depletion was confined to the striatum and lateral pallidum. This is consistent with the view that striatal GABA-containing interneurons degenerate. Significant losses of choline acetyltransferase activity were observed in the striatum, nucleus accumbens, septal nuclei and hippocampus. The development of muscle rigidity in choreic patients did not significantly affect the neurochemical values. The neurochemical alterations in Huntington's chorea could not be attributed to differences in ante-mortem or post-mortem factors between the choreic group and the control and schizophrenic groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bogerts, B. (1985) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790310046006 · Cited by 880
Differential loss of striatal projection neurons in Huntington disease.
Reiner, A., Albin, R. L., Anderson, K. D., D'Amato, C. J., Penney, J. B., & Young, A. B. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.15.5733 · Cited by 839
Glass, M., Dragunow, M., & Faull, R. L. M. (2000) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00008-7 · Cited by 483
Kuhl, D. E., Phelps, M. E., Markham, C. H., Metter, E. J., Riege, W. H., & Winter, J. (1982) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410120504 · Cited by 376
Emson, P. C., Arregui, A., Clement-Jones, V., Sandberg, B. E. B., & Rossor, M. (1980) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(80)90237-1 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- SPOKES, E. G. S.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1980
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 179-210
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2243456881
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NEUROCHEMICAL ALTERATIONS IN HUNTINGTON'S CHOREA: A STUDY OF POST-MORTEM BRAIN TISSUE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/103.1.179
- The paper
- SPOKES, E. G. S. (1980). NEUROCHEMICAL ALTERATIONS IN HUNTINGTON'S CHOREA: A STUDY OF POST-MORTEM BRAIN TISSUE. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/103.1.179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.