Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 387

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

PSYCHOPHYSICAL AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE PAIN-RELIEVING EFFECTS OF HETEROTOPIC NOCICEPTIVE STIMULI

WILLER, J. C., ROBY, A., BARS, D. LE·1984·Brain

Abstract

The nociceptive flexion reflex (RIII reflex) and the concurrent subjective pain score elicited by right sural nerve stimulation at random intensities were studied in 10 healthy volunteers. A close relationship was found between the recruitment curves of the reflex and the pain score as a function of stimulus intensity. As a consequence, the threshold of the RIII reflex (Tr) and of pain sensation (Tp) were found to be almost identical (mean: 9.8 and 11.3 mA, respectively). Similarly, the threshold for obtaining a maximal reflex response (Tmr) was found to be very close to that for intolerable pain (Tip): 33.5 and 35.1 mA, respectively. These four parameters were studied before and during the immersion of the left hand into a heated thermoregulated waterbath at various temperatures (from 40 to 47.5 degrees C). While nonnociceptive temperatures (40 to 44 degrees C) were without effect, higher conditioning temperatures induced an increase in the four thresholds. In addition, a highly significant linear relationship was observed between the increase in these thresholds and the intensity of the conditioning stimulus in the 44 to 47.5 degrees C range. These four parameters were also studied before and during three other nociceptive conditioning stimuli: immersion of the left hand into a 6 degrees C waterbath, 10 watts muscular exercise of the left hand performed under ischaemia and a painful (5.5 kg/cm2) pinch applied on the nasal septum. These three conditioning situations induced a very significant increase of the four thresholds considered in this study with the greatest being observed during nociceptive cold applied to the left hand. During all the conditioning situations, variations in Tr and Tp as well as in Tmr and Tip were found to be linearly related. This indicates a close relationship between the effects of the conditioning nociceptive stimuli on the reflex and the related pain sensation. These results suggest that the modulation of pain by heterotopic nociceptive stimuli can be explained at least in part by a depression in the transmission of nociceptive messages at the spinal level. They are discussed with reference to the counterirritation phenomena and common features with 'diffuse noxious inhibitory controls' (DNIC) are underlined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/107.4.1095

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 387

Metadata

Authors
WILLER, J. C., ROBY, A., & BARS, D. L.
Venue
Brain
Published
1984
Volume
107
Issue
4
Pages
1095-1112
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2017166043
Cited by
387
References
0
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PSYCHOPHYSICAL AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE PAIN-RELIEVING EFFECTS OF HETEROTOPIC NOCICEPTIVE STIMULI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/107.4.1095
The paper
WILLER, J. C., ROBY, A., & BARS, D. L. (1984). PSYCHOPHYSICAL AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE PAIN-RELIEVING EFFECTS OF HETEROTOPIC NOCICEPTIVE STIMULI. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/107.4.1095

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.