The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF MOTOR CORTEX, NIGROSTRIATAL DOPAMINE AND CAUDATE-PUTAMEN TO SKILLED FORELIMB USE IN THE RAT
Abstract
Skilled forelimb use was studied in rats with unilateral lesions of the sensorimotor cortex, the caudate-putamen, or the dopaminergic nigrostriatal bundle, in a task involving reaching for food. Limb preference and efficiency were evaluated, as well as the relationship between limb use, spontaneous, and methamphetamine-induced rotation bias, both preoperatively and postoperatively. To induce use of the nonpreferred limb, a bracelet, which prevented reaching but not other movements, was attached to the forearm of the preferred forelimb. Whereas small cortical lesions of the forepaw area of the sensorimotor cortex mildly influenced limb preference and use, larger lesions changed preference. Furthermore, medium-sized sensorimotor cortex lesions impaired contralateral limb use, although surprising recovery occurred on the forced tests with the bracelet. Large cortical lesions abolished effective reaching even on the forced tests. Impairments similar to those following sensorimotor cortex lesions were also obtained following small and large caudate-putamen lesions. By contrast, unilateral dopamine depletions not only blocked use of the limb contralateral to the depletion but also impaired use of the ipsilateral limb. There was recovery in use of the ipsilateral forelimb but not the contralateral forelimb. Correlational analysis showed a weak relation between methamphetamine-induced rotation and limb preference preoperatively but no significant relation between these two variables postoperatively. The similarity in the deficits following sensorimotor cortex lesions and basal ganglia lesions suggests that skilled forelimb use depends upon a shared neural organization within the two systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 · Cited by 4,127
Tests to assess motor phenotype in mice: a user's guide
Brooks, S. P., & Dunnett, S. B. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2652 · Cited by 621
Self-citationThe involvement of nucleus accumbens dopamine in appetitive and aversive motivation
Salamone, J. D. (1994) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(94)90153-8 · Cited by 584
Salamone, J. D., Cousins, M. S., & Snyder, B. J. (1997) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(96)00017-6 · Cited by 517
Use-Dependent Exaggeration of Neuronal Injury after Unilateral Sensorimotor Cortex Lesions
Kozlowski, D. A., James, D. C., & Schallert, T. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-15-04776.1996 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- WHISHAW, I. Q., O'CONNOR, W. T., & DUNNETT, S. B.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 805-843
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2093203706
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF MOTOR CORTEX, NIGROSTRIATAL DOPAMINE AND CAUDATE-PUTAMEN TO SKILLED FORELIMB USE IN THE RAT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/109.5.805
- The paper
- WHISHAW, I. Q., O'CONNOR, W. T., & DUNNETT, S. B. (1986). THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF MOTOR CORTEX, NIGROSTRIATAL DOPAMINE AND CAUDATE-PUTAMEN TO SKILLED FORELIMB USE IN THE RAT. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/109.5.805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.