The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE PATTERN OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL IMPAIRMENT ASSOCIATED WITH LEFT POSTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY INFARCTS
Abstract
We investigated the neuropsychological correlates of left posterior cerebral artery (LPCA) infarcts with a quantitative systematic approach and found a pattern of impairment extending well beyond the classical syndrome of alexia without agraphia. Sixteen consecutive patients with CT scan evidence of an infarct confined to the territory of LPCA were given a battery of tests assessing the following abilities. (1) Reading and writing; (2) naming and pointing to colours; (3) naming the same 30 objects on visual (objects and coloured photographs), tactile and verbal presentation; and (4) verbal memory. These tests were administered to large control samples and the performance of LPCA patients was considered pathological if it fell below the score of the last or second to last control patient. Seventy five per cent of PCA patients had alexia without agraphia. Although a lesion of the CT scan slice where the pineal is represented appeared to be crucially associated with alexia, the severity of the disorder increased when contiguous upper or lower slices were also involved. Not only colour anomia, but also object and especially photograph anomia could almost always be shown in alexics and were highly correlated with the degree of the reading impairment. The naming deficit was also present when items were presented in the tactile and verbal modality, in spite of the integrity of the oral language areas. Every right-handed patient, alexic as well as nonalexic, was impaired on at least two of the three verbal memory tests and most on all of them. The findings are discussed in terms of the anatomofunctional mechanisms subserving verbal memory and the transmission of visual information to the speech areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe
Nobre, A. C., Allison, T., & McCarthy, G. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/372260a0 · Cited by 789
A multimodal language region in the ventral visual pathway
Büchel, C., Price, C., & Friston, K. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/28389 · Cited by 378
Kuperberg, G. R., McGuire, P. K., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M. J., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Wright, I. C., Lythgoe, D. J., Williams, S. C. R., & David, A. S. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900562138 · Cited by 305
Making sense of discourse: an fMRI study of causal inferencing across sentences
Kuperberg, G. R., Lakshmanan, B. M., Caplan, D. N., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.001 · Cited by 169
Wright, N. D., Mechelli, A., Noppeney, U., Veltman, D. J., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Glensman, J., Haynes, J., & Price, C. J. (2008) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20443 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- RENZI, E. D., ZAMBOLIN, A., & CRISI, G.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1099-1116
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2071821156
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE PATTERN OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL IMPAIRMENT ASSOCIATED WITH LEFT POSTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY INFARCTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/110.5.1099
- The paper
- RENZI, E. D., ZAMBOLIN, A., & CRISI, G. (1987). THE PATTERN OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL IMPAIRMENT ASSOCIATED WITH LEFT POSTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY INFARCTS. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/110.5.1099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.