Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION IN INTACT MAN: 2. MULTIPLE DESCENDING VOLLEYS

DAY, B. L., ROTHWELL, J. C., THOMPSON, P. D, DICK, J. P. R., COWAN, J. M. A., BERARDELLI, A., MARSDEN, C. D.·1987·Brain

Abstract

Using an isometric strain gauge, we measured the twitch force produced in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle by a single anodal shock to the contralateral scalp. At high intensities of stimulation this twitch can greatly exceed the force produced by supramaximal stimulation of peripheral nerve. This indicates that a single cortical shock can cause repetitive firing of some or all FDI motoneurons. Such repetitive firing was demonstrated using a collision technique in which a supramaximal ulnar nerve stimulus was given at the wrist shortly after a cortical shock. The antidromic volley from the peripheral nerve stimulation failed to obliterate completely the response to cortical stimulation. Additional EMG activity was visible in the normally silent period between ulnar M and F waves. This activity must have been due to the presence of repetitive volleys of activity set up in spinal motoneurons by the cortical shock. Such activity summates with the twitch produced by the ulnar M wave to produce a very large force twitch of the muscle. Multiple firing of some motoneurons can be observed in some individuals at cortical stimulation intensities below that necessary to evoke activity in all the motoneurons in the FDI pool. Multiple firing probably was caused by repetitive excitatory inputs impinging on spinal motoneurons. These could be demonstrated using poststimulus time histogram techniques on single motor units. Low intensities of cortical stimulation produced a single short duration (mean 1.8 ms) peak of increased motor unit firing 20 to 30 ms after the shock. At high intensities, this was followed by extra peaks some 4 to 5 ms later. H reflex testing showed that the threshold of the initial descending volley, produced by the cortical stimulus was uninfluenced by a voluntary contraction. These results are discussed with reference to the D and I waves recorded from pyramidal tract after anodal stimulation of the exposed cortex in animals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/110.5.1191

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 338

Metadata

Authors
DAY, B. L., ROTHWELL, J. C., THOMPSON, P. D., DICK, J. P. R., COWAN, J. M. A., BERARDELLI, A., & MARSDEN, C. D.
Venue
Brain
Published
1987
Volume
110
Issue
5
Pages
1191-1209
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2615968698
Cited by
338
References
0
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION IN INTACT MAN: 2. MULTIPLE DESCENDING VOLLEYS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/110.5.1191
The paper
DAY, B. L., ROTHWELL, J. C., THOMPSON, P. D., DICK, J. P. R., COWAN, J. M. A., BERARDELLI, A., & MARSDEN, C. D. (1987). MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION IN INTACT MAN: 2. MULTIPLE DESCENDING VOLLEYS. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/110.5.1191

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.