The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MOTOR REORGANIZATION AFTER UPPER LIMB AMPUTATION IN MAN: A STUDY WITH FOCAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION
Abstract
To evaluate reorganization in motor pathways following amputation, we studied motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation in 7 patients with unilateral upper limb amputations, a patient with congenital absence of a hand, and 10 normal subjects. Electromyographic recordings were made from biceps and deltoid muscles immediately proximal to the stump and the same contralateral muscles. Magnetic stimulation was delivered by a Cadwell MES-10 magnetic stimulator through a 'figure eight' magnetic coil over scalp positions separated by 1-2.5 cm. Maximal M responses were elicited by peripheral nerve stimulation at Erb's point. The amplitude of MEPs was expressed both as absolute values and as a percentage of maximal responses to peripheral nerve stimulation. Threshold for activation of muscles ipsilateral and contralateral to the stump and the region of excitable scalp positions were also determined in 7 patients. Magnetic scalp stimulation induced a sensation of movement in the missing hand or fingers in the patients with acquired amputation, but failed to do so in the patient with congenital absence of a limb. It evoked larger MEPs, recruited a larger percentage of the motoneuron pool, and elicited MEPs at lower intensities of stimulation in muscles ipsilateral to the stump than in contralateral muscles. Muscles ipsilateral to the stump could be activated from a larger area than those contralateral to the stump. These results are compatible with cortical or spinal reorganization in adult human motor pathways targeting muscles proximal to the stump after amputations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1970) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009022 · Cited by 3,030
Cited by
Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury
Raineteau, O., & Schwab, M. E. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35067570 · Cited by 803
Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex
Wassermann, E. M., McShane, L. M., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G. (1992) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(92)90094-r · Cited by 593
Self-citationThe body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness
Berlucchi, G., & Aglioti, S. (1997) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01136-3 · Cited by 558
Distinguishable brain activation networks for short- and long-term motor skill learning
Floyer-Lea, A., & Matthews, P. M. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00717.2004 · Cited by 422
Image-Guided Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulates Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex
Lee, W., Kim, H., Jung, Y., Song, I.-U., Chung, Y. A., & Yoo, S.-S. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep08743 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- COHEN, L. G., BANDINELLI, S., FINDLEY, T. W., & HALLETT, M.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 615-627
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W1988918035
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MOTOR REORGANIZATION AFTER UPPER LIMB AMPUTATION IN MAN: A STUDY WITH FOCAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/114.1.615
- The paper
- COHEN, L. G., BANDINELLI, S., FINDLEY, T. W., & HALLETT, M. (1991). MOTOR REORGANIZATION AFTER UPPER LIMB AMPUTATION IN MAN: A STUDY WITH FOCAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/114.1.615
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.