Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MULTIPLE REPRESENTATIONS CONTRIBUTE TO BODY KNOWLEDGE PROCESSING: EVIDENCE FROM A CASE OF AUTOTOPAGNOSIA

Open access
SIRIGU, ANGELA, GRAFMAN, JORDAN, BRESSLER, KAREN, SUNDERLAND, TREY·1991·Brain

Abstract

Body schema disturbances were studied in a 62-yr-old woman with Alzheimer's disease. She was severely impaired in verbal and nonverbal tasks requiring her to localize body parts (on her own body, the examiner's body or a doll's body) even though she correctly named the same parts when pointed at by the examiner. Pointing responses were misdirected mainly to parts contiguous with the target area and, to a lesser extent, to functionally equivalent body parts. We also found that the patient was able to define body part names functionally but not spatially. In another series of tasks, and in contrast to the above results, performances were normal when small objects, attached to the patient's body, served as pointing targets. Furthermore, on subsequent testing she pointed correctly at the remembered position of these objects. The fact that the same point in 'body space' is localized correctly when it corresponds to an external object and erroneously when it corresponds to a body part contradicts the idea of the body schema as a unitary function. Learning the position of objects on the body surface requires access to some form of body-reference system on which this information can be mapped. We argue that such a system can be available in autotopagnosia and is independent from the visuospatial representations of the body structure that are postulated to be damaged or inaccessible in this syndrome. An integrated account of the present results and of those reported by other authors suggests that multiple levels of representation (e.g., sensorimotor, visuospatial, semantic) are involved in the organization of body knowledge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/114.1.629

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
SIRIGU, A., GRAFMAN, J., BRESSLER, K., & SUNDERLAND, T.
Venue
Brain
Published
1991
Volume
114
Issue
1
Pages
629-642
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2133714345
Cited by
301
References
1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MULTIPLE REPRESENTATIONS CONTRIBUTE TO BODY KNOWLEDGE PROCESSING: EVIDENCE FROM A CASE OF AUTOTOPAGNOSIA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/114.1.629
The paper
SIRIGU, A., GRAFMAN, J., BRESSLER, K., & SUNDERLAND, T. (1991). MULTIPLE REPRESENTATIONS CONTRIBUTE TO BODY KNOWLEDGE PROCESSING: EVIDENCE FROM A CASE OF AUTOTOPAGNOSIA. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/114.1.629

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.