CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,017Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and MemoryHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DEFICITS IN STRATEGY APPLICATION FOLLOWING FRONTAL LOBE DAMAGE IN MAN

SHALLICE, TIM, BURGESS, PAUL W.·1991·Brain
DOI 10.1093/brain/114.2.727
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A quantitative investigation of the ability to carry out a variety of cognitive tasks was performed in 3 patients who had sustained traumatic injuries which involved prefrontal structures. All 3 had severe difficulties in 2 tests which required them to carry out a number of fairly simple but open-ended tasks over a 15-30 min period. They typically spent too long on individual tasks. All patients scored well on tests of perception, language and intelligence and 2 performed well on a variety of other tests of frontal lobe function. Explanations for their difficulty on the multiple subgoal tasks in terms of memory or motivational problems could be excluded. It is argued that the problem arose from an inability to reactivate after a delay previously-generated intentions when they are not directly signalled by the stimulus situation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/114.2.727

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 28 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,001–1,004 of 1,004

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
SHALLICE, T., & BURGESS, P. W.
Affiliations
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
Corresponding author
SHALLICE, TIM
ORCID
BURGESS, PAUL W.
Venue
Brain
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1991
Volume
114
Issue
2
Pages
727-741
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
DOI
10.1093/brain/114.2.727
OpenAlex
W2138210540
Cited by
2,017
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 112 · 2012: 89
FWCI
11.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
frontal lobe damage, prefrontal cortex, executive dysfunction, strategy use, task planning, delayed intentions, cognitive task performance, traumatic brain injury, open-ended tasks
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adult, Brain Injuries, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Reference Values, Skull Fractures, Wechsler Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review