Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

SACCADIC DYSMETRIA IN A PATIENT WITH A RIGHT FRONTOPARIETAL LESION: THE IMPORTANCE OF COROLLARY DISCHARGE FOR ACCURATE SPATIAL BEHAVIOUR

DUHAME, JEAN-KENÉ, GOLDBERG, MICHAEL E., FITZGIBBON, EDMOND J., SIRIGU, ANGELA, GRAFMAN, JORDAN·1992·Brain

Abstract

Double-step experiments have demonstrated that retinotopic coding is inadequate to explain the spatial performance of the saccadic system. In such experiments a subject is asked to make two successive saccades to fixate two sequentially flashed targets each of which disappears before the first saccade. Despite the dissonance thus created between the retinal location of the second target and the saccade necessary to acquire it, normal humans and monkeys perform the task perfectly well. Single unit recording in monkeys indicates that neurons in the superior colliculus, frontal eye fields and in parietal cortex generate a spatially accurate signal during the performance of double-step saccades, which is thought to be obtained by combining a retinotopic signal with a signal corollary to the previous saccadic eye movement. We studied saccadic eye movements in a patient with a right fronto-parietal lesion using single- and double-step tasks. Single saccades into the left (contralesional) hemifield had longer latency and were hypometric relative to those into the right (ipsilesional) hemifield. Varying the initial orbital position had no effect on the latency and accuracy of saccades to left and right retinal stimuli. When the patient was asked to do a double-step task with targets flashed first into the right field and then into the left field, she performed well. When she was asked to do the same task with a target flashed first into the left field and then into the right field she made the first saccade correctly but never acquired the second target, even though this required her to make a saccade in the normal direction to a stimulus that appeared in the normal field. Such a deficit therefore cannot be one of retinotopic or spatial coding, nor can it be one of generating a certain direction of saccade. We suggest that the deficit is a failure of corollary discharge, the inability to register the amplitude and direction of a saccade into the contralesional field, and use that information to update the representation of the location of the next saccade target.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/115.5.1387

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
DUHAME, J.-K., GOLDBERG, M. E., FITZGIBBON, E. J., SIRIGU, A., & GRAFMAN, J.
Venue
Brain
Published
1992
Volume
115
Issue
5
Pages
1387-1402
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2023553109
Cited by
204
References
0
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SACCADIC DYSMETRIA IN A PATIENT WITH A RIGHT FRONTOPARIETAL LESION: THE IMPORTANCE OF COROLLARY DISCHARGE FOR ACCURATE SPATIAL BEHAVIOUR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/115.5.1387
The paper
DUHAME, J.-K., GOLDBERG, M. E., FITZGIBBON, E. J., SIRIGU, A., & GRAFMAN, J. (1992). SACCADIC DYSMETRIA IN A PATIENT WITH A RIGHT FRONTOPARIETAL LESION: THE IMPORTANCE OF COROLLARY DISCHARGE FOR ACCURATE SPATIAL BEHAVIOUR. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/115.5.1387

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.