Cited by 1,710Visual perception and processing mechanismsSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric DysfunctionMultisensory perception and integration

SPACE AND ATTENTION IN PARIETAL CORTEX

Colby, Carol L., Goldberg, Michael E.·1999·Annual Review of Neuroscience

Abstract

▪ Abstract The space around us is represented not once but many times in parietal cortex. These multiple representations encode locations and objects of interest in several egocentric reference frames. Stimulus representations are transformed from the coordinates of receptor surfaces, such as the retina or the cochlea, into the coordinates of effectors, such as the eye, head, or hand. The transformation is accomplished by dynamic updating of spatial representations in conjunction with voluntary movements. This direct sensory-to-motor coordinate transformation obviates the need for a single representation of space in environmental coordinates. In addition to representing object locations in motoric coordinates, parietal neurons exhibit strong modulation by attention. Both top-down and bottom-up mechanisms of attention contribute to the enhancement of visual responses. The saliance of a stimulus is the primary factor in determining the neural response to it. Although parietal neurons represent objects in motor coordinates, visual responses are independent of the intention to perform specific motor acts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.319

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LIP neurons exhibited spatially selective persistent activity that predicted whether an eye movement was planned into the response field on a memory guided saccade task.

    “These neurons exhibited spatially selective persistent activity that predicted whether an eye movement was planned into the response field (RF) of the neuron on a memory guided saccade task(29–31).”
  • LIP plays a multitude of cognitive and sensory-motor roles.

    “LIP plays a multitude of cognitive and sensory-motor roles that could, in principle, change during training and account for the changes in LIP responses during motion viewing 20–22.”
  • Previous studies have shown that LIP responses are modulated by many factors, such as attention, expectation, time, motor intention, experienced value, reward, and the prior probability of making an eye movement.

    “In addition, previous studies have shown that LIP responses are modulated by many factors, such as attention, expectation, time, motor intention, experienced value, reward, and the prior probability of making an eye movement12,13,39–42.”
  • Each core attention region contains multiple functional subcomponents.

    “Although we refer to the core regions of these systems as if they were homogeneous elements (e.g., IPS or FEF), each contains multiple functional subcomponents (5-7, 18, 19).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 103 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Neuroscience
Published
1999-03
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
319-349
ISSN
  • 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4126
OpenAlex
W2144200546
Cited by
1,710
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 75
FWCI
7.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
parietal cortex, spatial representation, attention, egocentric reference frame, top-down attention, bottom-up attention, salience, visual attention, object location, voluntary movement
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Brain Mapping, Eye Movements, Mouth, Parietal Lobe, Space Perception, Hand Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review