Cited by 74Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCognitive Functions and Memory

CHOLINERGIC ‘BLOCKADE’ AS A MODEL OF THE COGNITIVE DEFICITS IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

CHRISTENSEN, H., MALTBY, N., JORM, A. F., CREASEY, H., BROE, G. A.·1992·Brain

Abstract

The performance of 44 Alzheimer patients and 33 controls was examined on tests previously found to be differentially affected by scopolamine administration. Tests of secondary memory, performance intelligence, primary memory, semantic retrieval, procedural memory and verbal intelligence were included. It was found that Alzheimer patients performed more poorly than controls on tests of secondary memory, as measured by selective reminding, recall and recognition. Procedural memory, as measured by stem completion, homophone spelling and transformed text reading, did not differ between Alzheimer patients and controls. Semantic memory, verbal intelligence and primary memory were impaired in moderate and severe cases. However, patients with 'mild' dementia, as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination, did not differ from controls on tests of semantic memory, verbal intelligence and primary memory. It was concluded that the pattern of anterograde memory deficits and preserved abilities in mild dementia mimicked that previously observed in scopolamine administration in young subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/115.6.1681

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The degree to which acute mAChR blockade models such dementias seems rather impressive.

    “In light of these considerations, the degree to which acute mAChR blockade models such dementias seems rather impressive (see also Christensen et al, 1992; Aarsland et al, 1994; Broks et al, 1988).”

    From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Christensen et al, 1992

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CHRISTENSEN, H., MALTBY, N., JORM, A. F., CREASEY, H., & BROE, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
CHRISTENSEN, H.
Venue
Brain
Published
1992
Volume
115
Issue
6
Pages
1681-1699
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2005266346
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, cholinergic blockade, scopolamine, cognitive impairment, memory impairment, secondary memory, semantic memory, procedural memory, primary memory, verbal intelligence, mild dementia, anterograde amnesia, Mini-Mental State Examination
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Female, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Synaptic Transmission, Neuropsychological Tests, Scopolamine, Wechsler Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review