Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 490

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The clinical features of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy defined by the presence of a pathogenic mitochondrial DNA mutation

Riordan-Eva, P., Sanders, M. D., Govan, G. G., Sweeney, M. G., Costa, J. Da, Harding, A. E.·1995·Brain

Abstract

One hundred and seven patients from 79 families were defined as having Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) by the presence of one of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations at positions 11778 (60 families), 3460 (seven families) or 14484 (12 families). Only half of the 11778 index patients had a history of similarly affected relatives; this proportion was higher with the 3460 (71%) and 14484 (100%) mutations. The ratios of affected male to female patients were 2.5:1 (11778), 2:1 (3460), and 5.7:1 (14484). Detailed clinical data were available for 79 patients from 55 families. Visual loss developed between the ages of 11 and 30 years in 69%, with a range of 6-62 years, and no significant differences between mutation groups or males and females. It was bilateral in all but two patients, to a median of counting fingers with a central scotoma, developing simultaneously in 22% and sequentially in 78%, with a median inter-eye delay of 8 weeks, and progressing in each eye over a period of 4-6 weeks. Nineteen patients had pain in an affected eye or on eye movements, and four experienced Uhthoff's phenomenon. Retinal microangiopathy was uncommon after 6 months from onset and was not detected in 36% of patients examined within 3 months of visual loss; the microangiopathy was particularly uncommon in the 14484 group. There was no difference in the overall visual outcome between the 11778 and 3460 groups with median final visual acuities of 1/60 and 3/60, respectively. Particularly severe visual loss occurred in one-third of women with the 11778 mutation, to vague perception of light or no perception of light in at least one eye. A multiple sclerosis-like illness was observed in 45% of females with the 11778 mutation. Prognosis was substantially better in the 14484 patients, with recovery to a final visual acuity of at least 6/24, in 71% of patients. Good visual outcome was strongly correlated with age at onset, all those with onset before 20 years having a final visual acuity better than 6/24 as opposed to only 2 out of 6 with later onset. Improvement in vision occurred as long as 4 years after onset. High alcohol and tobacco consumption, cranial or ocular trauma, young or old age at presentation, co-existing neurological disease, and recent childbirth with post-partum haemorrhage, all contributed to diagnostic difficulties in this series, usually in the absence of a family history. These problems were resolved by mtDNA analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/118.2.319

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Riordan-Eva, P., Sanders, M. D., Govan, G. G., Sweeney, M. G., Costa, J. D., & Harding, A. E.
Venue
Brain
Published
1995
Volume
118
Issue
2
Pages
319-337
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2070864958
Cited by
490
References
0
FWCI
6.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.