The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spinal cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis: A new reproducible and sensitive MRI method with potential to monitor disease progression
Open accessAbstract
Recent MRI studies in multiple sclerosis have highlighted the potential importance of spinal cord atrophy (implicating axonal loss) in the development of disability. However, the techniques applied in these initial studies have poor reproducibility which limits their application in the serial monitoring of patients. The aim of this study was to develop a highly reproducible and accurate method for the quantification of atrophy. The technique we describe demonstrates an intra-observer coefficient of variation (scan-rescan) of only 0.8%. When applied to 60 patients with clinically definite multiple sclerosis there was a strong correlation between spinal cord area and disability measured by Kurtzke's Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (r = -0.7, P < 0.001). The correlation was graded providing evidence for a causal connection. At levels 3 and 8 of the EDSS we observed a reduction in average cord area of 12 and 35%, respectively. Given its reproducibility, the magnitude of the change detected and the strong correlation with disability, this new technique should prove to be a sensitive measure of progressive neurological deterioration and could be readily incorporated into imaging protocols aimed at monitoring therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
The longstanding MS lesion. A quantitative MRI and electron microscopic study
BARNES, D., MUNRO, P. M. G., YOUL, B. D., PRINEAS, J. W., & MCDONALD, W. I. (1991) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/114.3.1271 · Cited by 256
Self-citation
Cited by
Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis
Trapp, B. D., Peterson, J., Ransohoff, R. M., Rudick, R., Mörk, S., & Bö, L. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199801293380502 · Cited by 4,029
Ahuja, C. S., Wilson, J. R., Nori, S., Kotter, M. R. N., Druschel, C., Curt, A., & Fehlings, M. G. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.18 · Cited by 2,441
Acute axonal injury in multiple sclerosis: Correlation with demyelination and inflammation
Bitsch, A. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.6.1174 · Cited by 898
A longitudinal study of abnormalities on MRI and disability from multiple sclerosis
Brex, P. A., Ciccarelli, O., O'Riordan, J. I., Sailer, M., Thompson, A. J., & Miller, D. H. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011341 · Cited by 861
Self-citationPrimary-progressive multiple sclerosis
Miller, D. H., & Leary, S. M. (2007) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70243-0 · Cited by 818
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Losseff, N. A., Webb, S. L., O'Riordan, J. I., Page, R., Wang, L., Barker, G. J., Tofts, P. S., McDonald, W. I., Miller, D. H., & Thompson, A. J.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 701-708
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2028174673
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spinal cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis: A new reproducible and sensitive MRI method with potential to monitor disease progression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/119.3.701
- The paper
- Losseff, N. A., Webb, S. L., O'Riordan, J. I., Page, R., Wang, L., Barker, G. J., Tofts, P. S., McDonald, W. I., Miller, D. H., & Thompson, A. J. (1996). Spinal cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis: A new reproducible and sensitive MRI method with potential to monitor disease progression. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.3.701
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.