The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stimulation over the human supplementary motor area interferes with the organization of future elements in complex motor sequences
Abstract
We used high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to study the role of the mesial frontocentral cortex (including the supplementary motor area) in the organization of sequential finger movements of different complexity in humans. In 15 subjects, rTMS was randomly applied to the scalp overlying the region of the supplementary motor area and over other positions, including the contralateral primary motor cortex (hand area) during the performance of three overlearned finger sequences on an electronic piano. In all trials, rTMS (frequency 15-20 Hz) started 2 s after the first key press and lasted for approximately 2 s. All sequences were metronome-paced at 2 Hz and retrieved from memory. The 'simple' sequence consisted of 16 repeated index finger key presses, the 'scale' sequence of four times four sequential key presses of the little, ring, middle and index fingers, and the 'complex' sequence of a much less systematic and, therefore, more difficult series of 16 key presses. To measure the effects of rTMS interference with regional cortical function, we analysed rTMS-induced accuracy errors in the movement sequences. Stimulation over the supplementary motor area induced accuracy errors only in the complex sequence, while stimulation over the primary motor cortex induced errors in both the complex and scale sequences, and stimulation over other positions (e.g. F3, F4, FCz, P3, P4) did not interfere with sequence performance at all. Stimulation over the supplementary motor area interfered with the organization of subsequent elements in the complex sequence of movements, with error induction occurring approximately 1 s later than with stimulation over the primary motor cortex. Our findings are in keeping with recent results in non-human primates (Tanji J, Shima K. Nature, 1994; 371: 413-6) indicating a critical role of the supplementary motor area in the organization of forthcoming movements in complex motor sequences that are rehearsed from memory and fit into a precise timing plan.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning
Kami, A., Meyer, G., Jezzard, P., Adams, M. M., Turner, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377155a0 · Cited by 1,883
Cited by
Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain
Hallett, M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35018000 · Cited by 1,603
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory
Fregni, F., Boggio, P. S., Nitsche, M., Bermpohl, F., Antal, A., Feredoes, E., Marcolin, M. A., Rigonatti, S. P., Silva, M. T. A., Paulus, W., et al. (2005) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-005-2334-6 · Cited by 1,159
The Basal Ganglia and Chunking of Action Repertoires
Graybiel, A. M. (1998) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1006/nlme.1998.3843 · Cited by 1,042
Shima, K., & Tanji, J. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.3247 · Cited by 272
A combined fMRI study of typed spelling and reading
Purcell, J. J., Napoliello, E. M., & Eden, G. F. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.042 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerloff, C.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-09-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1587-1602
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2138807694
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.