Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 329

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stimulation over the human supplementary motor area interferes with the organization of future elements in complex motor sequences

Gerloff, C·1997·Brain

Abstract

We used high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to study the role of the mesial frontocentral cortex (including the supplementary motor area) in the organization of sequential finger movements of different complexity in humans. In 15 subjects, rTMS was randomly applied to the scalp overlying the region of the supplementary motor area and over other positions, including the contralateral primary motor cortex (hand area) during the performance of three overlearned finger sequences on an electronic piano. In all trials, rTMS (frequency 15-20 Hz) started 2 s after the first key press and lasted for approximately 2 s. All sequences were metronome-paced at 2 Hz and retrieved from memory. The 'simple' sequence consisted of 16 repeated index finger key presses, the 'scale' sequence of four times four sequential key presses of the little, ring, middle and index fingers, and the 'complex' sequence of a much less systematic and, therefore, more difficult series of 16 key presses. To measure the effects of rTMS interference with regional cortical function, we analysed rTMS-induced accuracy errors in the movement sequences. Stimulation over the supplementary motor area induced accuracy errors only in the complex sequence, while stimulation over the primary motor cortex induced errors in both the complex and scale sequences, and stimulation over other positions (e.g. F3, F4, FCz, P3, P4) did not interfere with sequence performance at all. Stimulation over the supplementary motor area interfered with the organization of subsequent elements in the complex sequence of movements, with error induction occurring approximately 1 s later than with stimulation over the primary motor cortex. Our findings are in keeping with recent results in non-human primates (Tanji J, Shima K. Nature, 1994; 371: 413-6) indicating a critical role of the supplementary motor area in the organization of forthcoming movements in complex motor sequences that are rehearsed from memory and fit into a precise timing plan.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/120.9.1587

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gerloff, C.
Venue
Brain
Published
1997-09-01
Volume
120
Issue
9
Pages
1587-1602
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2138807694
Cited by
329
References
1
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.