Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in normal-appearing brain correlates with outcome in patients following traumatic brain injury

Garnett, M. R.·2000·Brain

Abstract

The long-term clinical outcome following traumatic brain injury (TBI) can be difficult to predict. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) has previously been used to demonstrate abnormalities in regions of white matter that appear normal on conventional imaging in patients following TBI. We report MRI and MRS studies of 26 patients performed at an early time point following injury (mean 12 days, n = 21) and at a later time point (mean 6.2 months, n = 15). The proton MRS was acquired from the posterior part of a normal-appearing frontal lobe containing predominantly white matter using stimulated echo acquisition mode to localize, with a relaxation time of 3000 ms and echo time of 30 ms. At both the early and late time points the N:-acetylaspartate/creatine ratio (NAA/Cr) was significantly reduced (P = 0.03, P = 0.005, respectively), the choline/creatine ratio (Cho/Cr) significantly increased (P = 0.001, P = 0.004, respectively) and the myo-inositol/creatine ratio (Ins/Cr) significantly increased (P = 0.03, P = 0.03, respectively) compared with controls. There was a small, but significant, further reduction (P = 0.02) in the NAA/Cr between the two studies in the 10 patients for whom data was available, at both time points. The NAA/Cr acquired at the early time point significantly correlated with the clinical outcome of the patients, assessed using either the Glasgow outcome scale (P = 0.005, n = 17) or the disability rating scale (P < 0.001, n = 17). We conclude that there is a sustained alteration in NAA and Cho. These findings provide possible evidence for cellular injury (NAA loss reflecting neuroaxonal cell damage and raised Cho and Ins reflecting glial proliferation) not visible by conventional imaging techniques. This may be relevant to understanding the extent of disability following TBI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/123.10.2046

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Garnett, M. R.
Venue
Brain
Published
2000-10-01
Volume
123
Issue
10
Pages
2046-2054
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2094411116
Cited by
275
References
2
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.