Proton MRS in acute traumatic brain injury: Role for glutamate/glutamine and choline for outcome prediction
Abstract
Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is being used to evaluate individuals with acute traumatic brain injury and several studies have shown that changes in certain brain metabolites (N-acetylaspartate, choline) are associated with poor neurologic outcomes. The majority of previous MRS studies have been obtained relatively late after injury and none have examined the role of glutamate/ glutamine (Glx). We conducted a prospective MRS study of 42 severely injured adults to measure quantitative metabolite changes early (7 days) after injury in normal appearing brain. We used these findings to predict long-term neurologic outcome and to determine if MRS data alone or in combination with clinical outcome variables provided better prediction of long-term outcomes. We found that glutamate/glutamine (Glx) and choline (Cho) were significantly elevated in occipital gray and parietal white matter early after injury in patients with poor long-term (6-12-month) outcomes. Glx and Cho ratios predicted long-term outcome with 94% accuracy and when combined with the motor Glasgow Coma Scale score provided the highest predictive accuracy (97%). Somatosensory evoked potentials were not as accurate as MRS data in predicting outcome. Elevated Glx and Cho are more sensitive indicators of injury and predictors of poor outcome when spectroscopy is done early after injury. This may be a reflection of early excitotoxic injury (i.e., elevated Glx) and of injury associated with membrane disruption…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
M1 alterations in glutamate and abnormal interactions between M1 GABA and glutamate have been shown in the acute and chronic phases of TBI and sport-related mTBI using magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
“M1 alterations in glutamate (Babikian et al., 2006; Henry et al, 2010; Shutter et al., 2004) and abnormal interactions between M1 GABA and glutamate (Tremblay et al., 2014) have been shown in the acute and chronic phases of TBI and sport-related mTBI using magnetic resonance spectroscopy.”
From Theta burst stimulation to characterize changes in brain plasticity following mild traumatic brain injury: A proof-of-principle study (2015) · cites this paper as Shutter et al., 2004
Cites
Brewer, G. J., & Wallimann, T. W. (2000) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0741968.x · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Marion, D. W., & Carlier, P. M. (1994) · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · doi:10.1097/00005373-199401000-00014 · Cited by 226 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Advances in intensive care management, such as the frequent and early use of sedatives and paralytics, can influence initial clinical examinations and result in inaccurate determinations of the best GCS score as well as assessment of pupillary reactivity (Marion and Carlier, 1994).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baugh, C. M., Stamm, J. M., Riley, D. O., Gavett, B. E., Shenton, M. E., Lin, A., Nowinski, C. J., Cantu, R. C., McKee, A. C., & Stern, R. A. (2012) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-012-9164-5 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Clinical appraisal of chronic traumatic encephalopathy: current perspectives and future directions
Gavett, B. E., Cantu, R. C., Shenton, M., Lin, A. P., Nowinski, C. J., McKee, A. C., & Stern, R. A. (2011) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e32834cd477 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Tremblay, S., Vernet, M., Bashir, S., Pascual-Leone, A., & Théoret, H. (2015) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-140459 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shutter, L., Tong, K. A., & Holshouser, B. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
- Loma Linda University Medical Center (US)
- ORCID
- Shutter, Lori
- Venue
- Journal of Neurotrauma
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1693-1705
- ISSN
- 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9042
- OpenAlex
- W2013434436
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Loma Linda University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- 1H NMR, acute traumatic brain injury, glutamate/glutamine, choline, outcome prediction, neurological outcome, excitotoxicity, diffuse axonal injury, somatosensory evoked potentials, Glasgow Coma Scale, normal-appearing brain
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aspartic Acid, Brain Injuries, Cerebral Cortex, Choline, Creatinine, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glutamine, Humans, Inositol, Male, Middle Aged, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Glutamic Acid, Glasgow Outcome Scale
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review