Cited by 142Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Proton MRS in acute traumatic brain injury: Role for glutamate/glutamine and choline for outcome prediction

Shutter, Lori, Tong, Karen A., Holshouser, Barbara A.·2004·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is being used to evaluate individuals with acute traumatic brain injury and several studies have shown that changes in certain brain metabolites (N-acetylaspartate, choline) are associated with poor neurologic outcomes. The majority of previous MRS studies have been obtained relatively late after injury and none have examined the role of glutamate/ glutamine (Glx). We conducted a prospective MRS study of 42 severely injured adults to measure quantitative metabolite changes early (7 days) after injury in normal appearing brain. We used these findings to predict long-term neurologic outcome and to determine if MRS data alone or in combination with clinical outcome variables provided better prediction of long-term outcomes. We found that glutamate/glutamine (Glx) and choline (Cho) were significantly elevated in occipital gray and parietal white matter early after injury in patients with poor long-term (6-12-month) outcomes. Glx and Cho ratios predicted long-term outcome with 94% accuracy and when combined with the motor Glasgow Coma Scale score provided the highest predictive accuracy (97%). Somatosensory evoked potentials were not as accurate as MRS data in predicting outcome. Elevated Glx and Cho are more sensitive indicators of injury and predictors of poor outcome when spectroscopy is done early after injury. This may be a reflection of early excitotoxic injury (i.e., elevated Glx) and of injury associated with membrane disruption…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1693

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • M1 alterations in glutamate and abnormal interactions between M1 GABA and glutamate have been shown in the acute and chronic phases of TBI and sport-related mTBI using magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

    “M1 alterations in glutamate (Babikian et al., 2006; Henry et al, 2010; Shutter et al., 2004) and abnormal interactions between M1 GABA and glutamate (Tremblay et al., 2014) have been shown in the acute and chronic phases of TBI and sport-related mTBI using magnetic resonance spectroscopy.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shutter, L., Tong, K. A., & Holshouser, B. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
  • Loma Linda University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
2004-12
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
1693-1705
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W2013434436
Cited by
142
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Loma Linda University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
1H NMR, acute traumatic brain injury, glutamate/glutamine, choline, outcome prediction, neurological outcome, excitotoxicity, diffuse axonal injury, somatosensory evoked potentials, Glasgow Coma Scale, normal-appearing brain
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aspartic Acid, Brain Injuries, Cerebral Cortex, Choline, Creatinine, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glutamine, Humans, Inositol, Male, Middle Aged, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Glutamic Acid, Glasgow Outcome Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review