The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia: An overview and working hypothesis
Abstract
Five to ten per cent of school-age children fail to learn to read in spite of normal intelligence, adequate environment and educational opportunities. Thus defined, developmental dyslexia (hereafter referred to as dyslexia) is usually considered of constitutional origin, but its actual mechanisms are still mysterious and currently remain the subject of intense research endeavour in various neuroscientific areas and along several theoretical frameworks. This article reviews evidence accumulated to date that favours a dysfunction of neural systems known to participate in the normal acquisition and achievement of reading and other related cognitive functions. Historically, the first arguments for a neurological basis of dyslexia came from neuropathological studies of brains from dyslexic individuals. These early studies, although open to criticism, for the first time drew attention towards a possible abnormality in specific stages of prenatal maturation of the cerebral cortex and suggested a role of atypical development of brain asymmetries. This has prompted a large amount of subsequent work using in vivo imaging methods in the same vein. These latter studies, however, have yielded less clear-cut results than expected, but have globally confirmed some subtle differences in brain anatomy whose exact significance is still under investigation. Neuropsychological studies have provided considerable evidence that the main mechanism leading to these children's learning difficulties is phonological in nature, namely a basic defect in segmenting and manipulating the phoneme constituents of speech. A case has also been made for impairment in brain visual mechanisms of reading as a possible contributing factor. This approach has led to an important conceptual advance with the suggestion of a specific involvement of one subsystem of vision pathways (the so-called magnosystem hypothesis). Both phonological and visual hypotheses have received valuable contribution from modern functional imaging techniques. Results of recent PET and functional MRI studies are reported here in some detail. Finally, one attractive interpretation of available evidence points to dyslexia as a multi-system deficit possibly based on a fundamental incapacity of the brain in performing tasks requiring processing of brief stimuli in rapid temporal succession. It is proposed that this so-called 'temporal processing impairment' theory of dyslexia could also account for at least some of the perceptual, motor and cognitive symptoms very often associated with the learning disorder, a coincidence that has remained unexplained so far.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory
Paulesu, E., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362342a0 · Cited by 2,230 · cited 1×
“These authors used the same experimental paradigm as in a previous study (Paulesu et al., 1993) comparing a rhyming and a memory condition.”
MethodRecanzone, G., Schreiner, C., & Merzenich, M. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-01-00087.1993 · Cited by 1,266
Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training
Merzenich, M. M., Jenkins, W. M., Johnston, P., Schreiner, C., Miller, S. L., & Tallal, P. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5245.77 · Cited by 1,000
Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia
Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Constable, R. T., Mencl, W. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Liberman, A. M., Skudlarski, P., Fletcher, J. M., et al. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.5.2636 · Cited by 872
Lateralization of speech and auditory temporal processing
Belin, P., Zilbovicius, M., Crozier, S., Thivard, L., Fontaine, A. A., Masure, M.-C., & Samson, Y. (1998) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892998562834 · Cited by 324
Cited by
Language‐specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area
Cohen, L., Lehéricy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S., & Dehaene, S. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf094 · Cited by 1,254
Moreno, S., Marques, C., Santos, A., Santos, M., Castro, S. L., & Besson, M. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn120 · Cited by 786
Impaired processing of rapid stimulus sequences in dyslexia
Hari, R., & Renvall, H. (2001) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01801-5 · Cited by 527
Functional abnormalities in the dyslexic brain: A quantitative meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies
Richlan, F., Kronbichler, M., & Wimmer, H. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20752 · Cited by 517
Improving language and literacy is a matter of time
Tallal, P. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1499 · Cited by 488
Metadata
- Authors
- Habib, M.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2373-2399
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2269076329
- Cited by
- 660
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 51.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia: An overview and working hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/123.12.2373
- The paper
- Habib, M. (2000). The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia: An overview and working hypothesis. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.12.2373
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.