Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 326

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The pathogenesis of lesions and normal-appearing white matter changes in multiple sclerosis: A serial diffusion MRI study

Werring, D. J.·2000·Brain

Abstract

The idea that the initiating event in the formation of all new multiple sclerosis lesions is a focal blood-brain barrier (BBB) leakage associated with perivascular inflammation has been challenged recently by the observation of subtle abnormalities in some quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) parameters (including the magnetization transfer ratio) prior to lesion enhancement. MR diffusion imaging can non-invasively quantify the average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC(av)), a measure of water molecule random motion that is sensitive to pathological change in multiple sclerosis lesions and to abnormalities in the normal-appearing white matter (NAWM). We therefore used MR diffusion imaging to investigate the dynamic evolution of water diffusion measurements in new enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions, in the NAWM from which they arise, and in anatomically matched contralateral NAWM regions from which no visible lesions develop. Gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd)-enhanced MRI and MR diffusion studies were performed monthly for 1 year in five multiple sclerosis patients with clinically and radiologically active disease. The ADC(av) was calculated at each time point of the study (before, during and after lesion appearance on Gd-enhanced scans) for each new enhancing lesion, and for regions matched for size and position in the contralateral NAWM. A steady and moderate increase in ADC(av) in prelesion NAWM was observed, which was followed by a rapid and marked increase at the time of Gd enhancement and a slower decay after the cessation of enhancement. In matched contralateral NAWM regions there was a significant but milder increase in ADC(av) at the time of the first noted lesion enhancement. These findings indicate that new focal lesions associated with frank BBB leakage are preceded by subtle, progressive alterations in tissue integrity beyond the resolution of conventional MRI. The increases in ADC(av) in anatomically matched contralateral regions after lesions have appeared supports the concept that structural damage in lesions causes damage or dysfunction in connected areas of NAWM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/123.8.1667

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 326

Metadata

Authors
Werring, D. J.
Venue
Brain
Published
2000-08-01
Volume
123
Issue
8
Pages
1667-1676
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2110080262
Cited by
326
References
46
FWCI
13.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The pathogenesis of lesions and normal-appearing white matter changes in multiple sclerosis: A serial diffusion MRI study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/123.8.1667
The paper
Werring, D. J. (2000). The pathogenesis of lesions and normal-appearing white matter changes in multiple sclerosis: A serial diffusion MRI study. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.8.1667

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.