Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does diabetes target ganglion neurones?: Progressive sensory neurone involvement in long-term experimental diabetes

Zochodne, D. W.·2001·Brain

Abstract

Targeting of dorsal root ganglia by diabetes could account for the selective sensory abnormalities that patients with early diabetic polyneuropathy develop. In this work, we addressed survival, phenotype and gene expression in sensory neurones in lumbar dorsal root ganglia in a long-term model of experimental streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats, designed to reflect human disease. Motor and sensory conduction slowing developed early, by the 2-month time point. At 2 months, sensory neurones had no detectable alterations in their calibre or gene expression, assessed using quantitative in situ hybridization studies for mRNA markers that included alpha CGRP, beta CGRP, NFM, t alpha 1-tubulin, SP, VIP, B50 (GAP43), galanin, somatostatin, PACAP, HSP27, c-jun, SNAP 25, p75, TrkA, TrkB and TrkC. By 12 months, however, diabetics had developed neurone perikaryal and distal axon atrophy, accompanied by generalized downregulation of mRNA expression, particularly of CGRP transcripts, PACAP, SP, NFM, p75, trkA and trkC. With the exception of HSP-27, no elevation in mRNAs that increase after injury, such as VIP, galanin, CCK, PACAP, B50 and t alpha 1-tubulin, was observed and constitutive levels, when detectable, trended towards lower rather than increased levels. There was relative preservation of neurone numbers at 12 months; only a non-significant trend towards fewer diabetic neurones was detected using a rigorous and systematic physical dissector counting approach through the entire L5 ganglia. There was no change in the relative populations of CGRP- and SP-immunoreactive neurones. Our findings indicate that even long-term experimental diabetes is associated with relative preservation of sensory neurone populations, but the neurones are atrophic and their gene expression is altered. This pattern of change differs from that following axotomy, implies a degenerative rather than an injury phenotype and has important implications for how such neurones might be rescued.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/124.11.2319

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Zochodne, D. W.
Venue
Brain
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
124
Issue
11
Pages
2319-2334
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2163420794
Cited by
158
References
2
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does diabetes target ganglion neurones?: Progressive sensory neurone involvement in long-term experimental diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/124.11.2319
The paper
Zochodne, D. W. (2001). Does diabetes target ganglion neurones?: Progressive sensory neurone involvement in long-term experimental diabetes. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.11.2319

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.