Cited by 193Historical and Modern Theater StudiesNeurology and Historical StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

THE FRONTAL LOBE IN MAN: A CLINICAL STUDY OF MAXIMUM REMOVALS

PENFIELD, WILDER, EVANS, JOSEPH·1935·Brain

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/58.1.115

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Penfield and Evans (1935) described a catastrophic impairment in the higher-order organisation of behaviour following frontal lobe damage, manifesting itself particularly sharply as an inability to coordinate the various activities involved in cooking a meal.

    “This seminal paper described a catastrophic impairment in the higherorder organisation of behaviour, manifesting itself for instance particularly sharply as an inability to coordinate the various activities involved in cooking a meal”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PENFIELD, W., & EVANS, J.
Venue
Brain
Published
1935
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
115-133
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W1995832567
Cited by
193
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
17.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Brain (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
frontal lobe, frontal lobe resection, frontal lobe epilepsy, surgical outcomes, frontal lobe tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review