Cited by 510Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Are the frontal lobes implicated in “planning” functions? Interpreting data from the Tower of Hanoi

Goel, Vinod, Grafman, Jordan·1995·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Twenty adult patients with lesions in the prefrontal cortex were tested on the Tower of Hanoi puzzle. The performance of patients was significantly worse than that of controls. This difference could not be accounted for in terms of a general decline in intelligence or memory, or by the size of the lesion. The results further suggest that both patients and controls used the same general strategy to solve the problem and that patients' difficulties with the task have little to do with planning or "look ahead" deficits (as is generally assumed in the neuropsychology literature). Patient performance is best explained in terms of an inability to see or resolve a goal-subgoal conflict. This interpretation is compatible with several existing accounts of frontal lobe dysfunction that postulate a failure of inhibition of a prepotent response to explain poor performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting task, the Stroop task, the Antisaccade task, the A-Not-B task, and the Delayed Alternation task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0028-3932(95)90866-p

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goel, V., & Grafman, J.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Grafman, Jordan
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-05
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
623-642
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966555477
Cited by
510
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 20
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, frontal lobe dysfunction, Tower of Hanoi, planning, prepotent response inhibition, executive function, neuropsychological assessment, problem-solving strategies, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Stroop task, antisaccade task, A-not-B task, delayed alternation task
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Functional Laterality, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Problem Solving, Reaction Time, Task Performance and Analysis, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review