Cited by 62Prion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes

EXPERIMENTAL KURU IN THE SPIDER MONKEY: HISTOPATHOLOGICAL AND ULTRASTRUCTURAL STUDIES OF THE BRAIN DURING EARLY STAGES OF INCUBATION

BECK, ELISABETH, BAK, I. J., CHRIST, J. F., GAJDUSEK, D. C., GIBBS, C. J., HASSLER, R.·1975·Brain

Abstract

The brains of 10 spider monkeys inoculated intracerebrally with brain suspension from kuru patients have been studied histologically and ultrastructurally. The animals were killed by perfusion of fixative from four to forty-one weeks after inoculation, when healthy and free of neurological signs. Definite histopathological changes had occurred as early as four weeks after inoculation, when moderate numbers of bi-nucleated neurons were found within the limbic cortex, striatum, the hypothalamus and amongst the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. At later stages of incubation a moderate loss of neurons in the cerebral and cerebellar cortex and a mild to moderate proliferation of fibrous astrocytes here and also in the hypothalamus were the most striking features. None of our cases showed either status spongiosus or the generalized astrocytic proliferation and hypertrophy, characteristic of fully developed experimental kuru, in any region of the brain. The principal ultrastructural abnormalities consisted of the formation of membrane-bound intracytoplasmic vacuoles, predominantly within dendrites, and of concentric laminar arrays derived from the endoplasmic reticulum. The former were seen in all regions of the brain examined and at all stages of incubation. Concentric laminar arrays were confined to the cerebellar nodulus, where they were most numerous in dendrites and neuronal perikarya four weeks after inoculation. Both changes are interpreted as an indication that the kuru agen…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/98.4.595

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Beck et al. confirmed the pioneer data and reported membrane lamination observed before full-blown pathology could be appreciated.

    “Those pioneer data were confirmed by Beck et al (89), who also reported membrane lamination observed before full-blown pathology could be appreciated.”

    From Kuru (2012) · cites this paper as [89]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BECK, E., BAK, I. J., CHRIST, J. F., GAJDUSEK, D. C., GIBBS, C. J., & HASSLER, R.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Brain Research (DE)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
BECK, ELISABETH
Venue
Brain
Published
1975
Volume
98
Issue
4
Pages
595-612
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2188405258
Cited by
62
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Keywords
spider monkeys, prion disease, status spongiosus, intracytoplasmic vacuoles, neuronal ultrastructure, astrocyte proliferation, neuronal loss, slow virus diseases
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Brain, Brain Stem, Cerebellar Cortex, Cerebellar Nuclei, Cerebellum, Cerebral Cortex, Corpus Striatum, Diencephalon, Disease Models, Animal, Globus Pallidus, Hypothalamus, Kuru, Neuroglia, Purkinje Cells, Putamen, Thalamus, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review