Cited by 32Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesGlaucoma and retinal disordersDrug-Induced Ocular Toxicity

Socioeconomic disparity is associated with faster retinal neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis

Open access
Vasileiou, Eleni S, Filippatou, Angeliki G, Pimentel Maldonado, Daniela, Kalaitzidis, Grigorios, Ehrhardt, Henrik, Lambe, Jeffrey, Saidha, Shiv, Sotirchos, Elias S +3 more·2021·Brain

Abstract

Disease course in multiple sclerosis is notably heterogeneous, and few prognostic indicators have been consistently associated with multiple sclerosis severity. In the general population, socioeconomic disparity is associated with multimorbidity and may contribute to worse disease outcomes in multiple sclerosis. Herein, we assessed whether indicators of socioeconomic status are associated with disease progression in patients with multiple sclerosis using highly sensitive imaging tools such as optical coherence tomography, and determined whether differential multiple sclerosis management or comorbidity mediate any observed socioeconomic status-associated effects. We included 789 participants with longitudinal optical coherence tomography and low contrast letter acuity (at 1.25 and 2.5%) in whom neighbourhood- (derived via nine-digit postal codes) and participant-level socioeconomic status indicators were available ≤10 years of multiple sclerosis symptom onset. Sensitivity analyses included participants with socioeconomic status indicators available ≤3years of symptom onset (n = 552). Neighbourhood-level indicators included state and national area deprivation indices, median household income and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Socioeconomic Status Index. Participant-level indicators included education level. Biannual optical coherence tomography scans were segmented to quantify thickness of the composite macular ganglion cell+inner plexiform (GCIPL) layer. We assessed the association between socioeconomic status indicators and GCIPL atrophy or low contrast letter acuity loss using mixed models adjusting for demographic (including race and ethnicity) and disease-related characteristics. We also assessed socioeconomic status indicators in relation to multiple sclerosis therapy changes and comorbidity risk using survival analysis. More disadvantaged neighbourhood-level and patient-level socioeconomic status indicators were associated with faster retinal atrophy. Differences in rate of GCIPL atrophy for individuals in the top quartile (most disadvantaged) relative to the bottom quartile (least) for state area deprivation indices were −0.12 µm/year faster [95% confidence interval (CI): −0.19, −0.04; P = 0.003], for national area deprivation indices were −0.08 µm/year faster (95% CI: −0.15, −0.005; P = 0.02), for household income were −0.11 µm/year faster (95% CI: −0.19, −0.03; P = 0.008), for AHRQ Socioeconomic Status Index were −0.12 µm/year faster (95% CI: −0.19, −0.04) and for education level were −0.17 µm/year faster (95% CI: −0.26, −0.08; P = 0.0002). Similar associations were observed for socioeconomic status indicators and low contrast letter acuity loss. Lower socioeconomic status was associated with higher risk of incident comorbidity during follow-up. Low socioeconomic status individuals had faster rates of therapy escalation, suggesting the association between socioeconomic status and GCIPL atrophy may not be explained by differential contemporaneous multiple sclerosis therapy management. In conclusion, socioeconomic disparity is associated with faster retinal neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. As low socioeconomic status was associated with a higher risk of incident comorbidities that may adversely affect multiple sclerosis outcomes, comorbidity prevention may mitigate some of the unfavourable socioeconomic status-associated consequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awab342

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A few observational studies have documented an inverse association between educational attainment and retinal neurodegeneration.

    “Furthermore, a few observational studies have documented an inverse association between educational attainment and subsequent MS disability31 as well as retinal neurodegeneration49.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Wallin MT, Culpepper WJ, Campbell JD, et al.; US Multiple Sclerosis Prevalence Workgroup. The prevalence of MS in the United States: A population-based estimate using health claims data. Neurology. 2019;92(10):e1029-e1040.
  2. Marrie RA. Comorbidity in multiple sclerosis: Implications for patient care. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(6):375-382.
  3. Kivima ¨ki M, Batty GD, Pentti J, et al. Association between socio- economic status and the development of mental and physical health conditions in adulthood: A multi-cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(3):e140-e149.
  4. Harding KE, Wardle M, Carruthers R, et al. Socioeconomic status and disability progression in multiple sclerosis: A multinational study. Neurology. 2019;92(13):e1497-e1506.
  5. Brown JWL, Coles A, Horakova D, et al.; MSBase Study Group. Association of initial disease-modifying therapy with later con- version to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. JAMA. 2019;321(2):175-187.
  6. Kowalec K, McKay KA, Patten SB, et al.; CIHR Team in Epidemiology and Impact of Comorbidity on Multiple Sclerosis (ECoMS). Comorbidity increases the risk of relapse in multiple sclerosis: A prospective study. Neurology. 2017;89(24):2455-2461.
  7. Syc SB, Warner CV, Hiremath GS, et al. Reproducibility of high- resolution optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2010;16(7):829-839.
  8. Kind AJH, Jencks S, Brock J, et al. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and 30-day rehospitalization: A retrospective co- hort study. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(11):765-774.
  9. Singh GK. Area deprivation and widening inequalities in US mortality, 1969-1998. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(7):1137-1143.
  10. Crimmins EM, Preston SH, Cohen B; National Research Council (US) Panel on Understanding Divergent Trends in Longevity in High-Income Countries. International differences in mortality at older ages. National Academies Press (US); 2010.
  11. Su JG, Jerrett M, Morello-Frosch R, Jesdale BM, Kyle AD. Inequalities in cumulative environmental burdens among three urbanized counties in California. Environ Int. 2012;40: 79-87.
  12. Wu GF, Schwartz ED, Lei T, et al. Relation of vision to global and regional brain MRI in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2007;69(23): 2128-2135.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vasileiou, E. S., Filippatou, A. G., Pimentel Maldonado, D., Kalaitzidis, G., Ehrhardt, H., Lambe, J., Saidha, S., Sotirchos, E. S., Mowry, E. M., Calabresi, P. A., & Fitzgerald, K. C.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Corresponding author
Fitzgerald, Kathryn C
Venue
Brain
Published
2021-10-29
Volume
144
Issue
12
Pages
3664-3673
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W3208713003
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1K01MH121582-01, R01NS082347)
  • National Multiple Sclerosis Society (TA-1805–31136, RG-1606–08768)
  • Race to Erase Multiple Sclerosis Foundation
  • Genentech Corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, socioeconomic status, socioeconomic disparities, retinal neurodegeneration, optical coherence tomography, neighborhood disadvantage, household income, educational attainment, multimorbidity, disease progression, prognosis, comorbidities, visual function decline, racial and ethnic disparities
MeSH terms
Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Retinal Degeneration, Socioeconomic Factors, Visual Acuity, Disease Progression, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review