The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inhibitory control of acquired motor programmes in the human brain
Open accessAbstract
An important basis of skilled human behaviour is the appropriate retrieval of acquired and memorized motor programmes ('motor memory traces'). Appropriate retrieval is warranted if motor programmes are only activated if necessary and are, probably more often, inhibited if required by the context of a given situation. It is unknown how this type of inhibition is accomplished in the brain. We studied context-dependent modulation of motor memory traces in 18 volunteers and six patients with focal dystonia. Cortical function was assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex (M1) and with task-related analysis of oscillatory EEG activity. An activation (ACT) and inhibition (INH) condition were compared. In both, visual cues were presented at 1/s. In ACT, subjects had to respond to these cues with individual finger movements as learned in a preceding training session. In INH, subjects had to observe the cues without retrieval of motor responses. During INH, inhibitory control of the motor memory trace was confirmed by significant amplitude reduction of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) compared with baseline. This was accompanied by a significant increase of 11-13 Hz oscillatory activity over the sensorimotor areas during INH. During active retrieval of the motor memory traces, the reverse was true (increased MEP amplitudes, decreased oscillatory 11-13 Hz activity). In a small sample of dystonic patients (n = 6), the increase of 11-13 Hz oscillatory activity during INH was consistently absent. The present data demonstrate for the first time cortical correlates of appropriate, context-dependent inhibition of motor memory traces. We propose that focal increases of oscillatory activity are instrumental for inhibitory control at the cortical level. This concept is supported by the preliminary observations in dystonic patients who are known to have deficits of inhibitory motor control and in whom these context-dependent focal increases of oscillatory activity were absent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Nudo, R. J., Wise, B. M., SiFuentes, F., & Milliken, G. W. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5269.1791 · Cited by 1,911
Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning
Kami, A., Meyer, G., Jezzard, P., Adams, M. M., Turner, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377155a0 · Cited by 1,883
Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role in information processing and learning
Singer, W. (1993) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002025 · Cited by 1,685
Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects
Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Ibañez, V., Deiber, M.-P., Dold, G., & Hallett, M. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380526a0 · Cited by 1,253
Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice
Classen, J., Liepert, J., Wise, S. P., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.1117 · Cited by 1,156
Pfurtscheller, G., & Aranibar, A. (1979) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(79)90063-4 · Cited by 758
Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate?
Decety, J. (1996) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00033-x · Cited by 643
Barkley, R. A. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.121.1.65 · Cited by 580
Destexhe, A., Contreras, D., & Steriade, M. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-11-04595.1999 · Cited by 573
Cited by
Neurophysiological and Computational Principles of Cortical Rhythms in Cognition
Wang, X.-J. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00035.2008 · Cited by 1,939
SAUSENG, P., KLIMESCH, W., SCHABUS, M., & DOPPELMAYR, M. (2005) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.03.018 · Cited by 814
Sadaghiani, S., Scheeringa, R., Lehongre, K., Morillon, B., Giraud, A.-L., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1004-10.2010 · Cited by 504
Experience-dependent structural plasticity in the adult human brain
May, A. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.002 · Cited by 512
Training-induced structural changes in the adult human brain
Draganski, B., & May, A. (2008) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.015 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Hummel, F., Andres, F., Altenmüller, E., Dichgans, J., & Gerloff, C.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 404-420
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2083863574
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhibitory control of acquired motor programmes in the human brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awf030
- The paper
- Hummel, F., Andres, F., Altenmüller, E., Dichgans, J., & Gerloff, C. (2002). Inhibitory control of acquired motor programmes in the human brain. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.