Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 427

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prospective study on the relationship between infections and multiple sclerosis exacerbations

Open access
Buljevac, D., Flach, H. Z., Hop, W. C. J., Hijdra, D., Laman, J. D., Savelkoul, H. F. J., van der Meché, F. G. A., van Doorn, P. A., Hintzen, R. Q.·2002·Brain

Abstract

One of the characteristics of multiple sclerosis is the unpredictable occurrence of exacerbations and remissions. These fluctuations in disease activity are related to alterations in (auto-)immune activity. Exacerbations lead to short-term morbidity, but may also influence long-term disability. This longitudinal study in 73 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis assessed the contribution of systemic infections to the natural course of exacerbations. In addition, we analysed whether infections lead to an increase in the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions. A total of 167 infections and 145 exacerbations were observed during 6466 patient weeks. During a predefined at-risk period (ARP) of 2 weeks before until 5 weeks after the onset of a clinical infection (predominantly upper airway infections), there was an increased risk of exacerbations (rate ratio 2.1), which is in accordance with previous studies. Exacerbations with onset during the ARP led more frequently to sustained deficit [increase of > or =1 Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) point or > or =0.5 above EDSS 5.5 for >3 months] than exacerbations with onset outside the ARP, with a rate ratio of 3.8. Minor and major exacerbations were equally distributed between the ARP and non-ARP onset groups. ARP exacerbations were associated with significantly higher plasma levels of the inflammatory marker soluble intracellular adhesion molecule 1 than non-ARP exacerbations, indicating relatively enhanced immune activation during ARP relapses. Three serial MRI scans were performed after the onset of an infection over a 6-week period. There was no difference in the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions between the three time points. In conclusion, exacerbations in the context of a systemic infection lead to more sustained damage than other exacerbations. There is no indication that this effect occurs through enhanced opening of the blood-brain barrier.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awf098

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 427

Metadata

Authors
Buljevac, D., Flach, H. Z., Hop, W. C. J., Hijdra, D., Laman, J. D., Savelkoul, H. F. J., van der Meché, F. G. A., van Doorn, P. A., & Hintzen, R. Q.
Venue
Brain
Published
2002-05
Volume
125
Issue
5
Pages
952-960
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2118966296
Cited by
427
References
5
FWCI
9.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective study on the relationship between infections and multiple sclerosis exacerbations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awf098
The paper
Buljevac, D., Flach, H. Z., Hop, W. C. J., Hijdra, D., Laman, J. D., Savelkoul, H. F. J., van der Meché, F. G. A., van Doorn, P. A., & Hintzen, R. Q. (2002). Prospective study on the relationship between infections and multiple sclerosis exacerbations. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf098

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.