The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vivo MRI of brain inflammation in human ischaemic stroke
Abstract
Inflammation contributes to brain damage caused by ischaemic stroke. Macrophages, as the prevailing inflammatory cell population in stroke lesions, can be visualized using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) as a cell-specific contrast agent for MRI. In this single-centre open-labelled clinical phase II study we tested the potential of USPIO-enhanced MRI for macrophage imaging in human ischaemic stroke lesions. In a series of 10 consecutive patients, USPIO contrast agent was infused at the end of the first week after symptom onset. Two follow-up MRI scans were performed 24-36 h and 48-72 h after infusion. Two distinct components of USPIO-related signal changes were discernible, one associated with blood vessels and one representing parenchymal enhancement. Vessel-associated changes appeared as signal loss on T2/T2*-weighted images and decreased from the first to second scan after USPIO infusion, most likely reflecting a transient blood pool effect of the contrast agent. Conversely, parenchymal enhancement was mainly evident on T1-weighted images, increased over time, and matched with the expected distribution of macrophages. Importantly, USPIO-induced signal alterations throughout differed from signatures of conventional gadolinium-enhanced MRI, thus being independent from breakdown of the blood-brain barrier. We suggest that increasing USPIO-enhancement on T1-weighted images indicates brain infiltration by USPIO-laden macrophages. Thus, USPIO-enhanced MRI may provide an in vivo surrogate marker of cellular inflammation in stroke and other CNS pathologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, Y.-X. J., Hussain, S. M., & Krestin, G. P. (2001) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s003300100908 · Cited by 1,381
Cited by
Nanomedicine: current status and future prospects
Moghimi, S. M., Hunter, A. C., & Murray, J. C. (2005) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.04-2747rev · Cited by 2,029
Reddy, L. H., Arias, J. L., Nicolas, J., & Couvreur, P. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300068p · Cited by 2,010
Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Probes for Molecular Imaging
Thorek, D. L. J., Chen, A. K., Czupryna, J., & Tsourkas, A. (2006) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-005-9002-7 · Cited by 772
Neuroinflammation and psychiatric illness
Najjar, S., Pearlman, D. M., Alper, K., Najjar, A., & Devinsky, O. (2013) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/1742-2094-10-43 · Cited by 733
Villaraza, A. J. L., Bumb, A., & Brechbiel, M. W. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900232t · Cited by 632
Metadata
- Authors
- Saleh, A., Schroeter, M., Jonkmanns, C., Hartung, H.-P., Modder, U., & Jander, S.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-05-05
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1670-1677
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2109030151
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo MRI of brain inflammation in human ischaemic stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awh191
- The paper
- Saleh, A., Schroeter, M., Jonkmanns, C., Hartung, H.-P., Modder, U., & Jander, S. (2004). In vivo MRI of brain inflammation in human ischaemic stroke. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.