The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Autologous olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation in human spinal cord injury
Abstract
Olfactory ensheathing cells transplanted into the injured spinal cord in animals promote regeneration and remyelination of descending motor pathways through the site of injury and the return of motor functions. In a single-blind, Phase I clinical trial, we aimed to test the feasibility and safety of transplantation of autologous olfactory ensheathing cells into the injured spinal cord in human paraplegia. Participants were three male paraplegics, 18-55 years of age, with stable, complete thoracic injuries 6-32 months previously, with stable spinal column, no implanted prostheses, and no syrinx. Olfactory ensheathing cells were grown and purified in vitro from nasal biopsies and injected into the region of damaged spinal cord. The trial design includes a matched injury group as a control for the assessors, who are blind to treatment status. Assessments, made before transplantation and at regular intervals subsequently, include MRI, medical, neurological and psychosocial assessments, and standard American Spinal Injury Association and Functional Independence Measure assessments. One year after cell implantation, there were no medical, surgical or other complications to indicate that the procedure is unsafe. There is no evidence of spinal cord damage nor of cyst, syrinx or tumour formation. There was no neuropathic pain reported by the participants, no change in psychosocial status and no evidence of deterioration in neurological status. Participants will be followed for 3 years to confirm long-term safety and to compare neurological, functional and psychosocial outcomes with the control group. We conclude transplantation of autologous olfactory ensheathing cells into the injured spinal cord is feasible and is safe up to one year post-implantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Therapeutic interventions after spinal cord injury
Thuret, S., Moon, L. D. F., & Gage, F. H. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1955 · Cited by 1,012
A First-in-Human, Phase I Study of Neural Stem Cell Transplantation for Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Curtis, E., Martin, J. R., Gabel, B., Sidhu, N., Rzesiewicz, T. K., Mandeville, R., Van Gorp, S., Leerink, M., Tadokoro, T., Marsala, S., et al. (2018) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2018.05.014 · Cited by 377
Rong, Y., Liu, W., Wang, J., Fan, J., Luo, Y., Li, L., Kong, F., Chen, J., Tang, P., & Cai, W. (2019) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-019-1571-8 · Cited by 333
Liu, W., Wang, Y., Gong, F., Rong, Y., Luo, Y., Tang, P., Zhou, Z., Zhou, Z., Xu, T., Jiang, T., et al. (2019) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2018.5835 · Cited by 325
Injectable hydrogel materials for spinal cord regeneration: a review
Macaya, D., & Spector, M. (2012) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-6041/7/1/012001 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Féron, F., Perry, C., Cochrane, J., Licina, P., Nowitzke, A., Urquhart, S., Geraghty, T., & Mackay-Sim, A.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-10-11
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2951-2960
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2108324820
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autologous olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation in human spinal cord injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awh657
- The paper
- Féron, F., Perry, C., Cochrane, J., Licina, P., Nowitzke, A., Urquhart, S., Geraghty, T., & Mackay-Sim, A. (2005). Autologous olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation in human spinal cord injury. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh657
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.